The Games Behind Your Government's Next War

01:12:31
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYaDXZ2MI-k

Summary

TLDRThe video examines the rising trend of government wargaming, exploring its historical context, modern resurgence, and implications for the gaming industry. It explains that wargaming involves using simulations resembling games to plan and practice military strategies, responding to current global instability. The video highlights the growing demand for skilled wargame designers and the sector's overlap with commercial gaming, involving shared innovations and technologies. Ethical concerns regarding the militarization of games are discussed, emphasizing the importance of understanding and debating these issues, especially as wargames can influence real-world military decisions. Opportunities for wargames beyond military use in crisis management and other fields are also explored. The video calls for a deeper reflection from the gaming industry and its community on the cultural and ethical impacts of wargaming.

Takeaways

  • ๐ŸŽฎ Wargaming is resurging within governments due to current strategic uncertainties.
  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Historically, wargaming has experienced fluctuations in popularity.
  • ๐Ÿ’ก Wargaming shares significant crossover with the commercial games industry.
  • ๐Ÿ•น๏ธ Game technology and design play roles in modern military simulations.
  • ๐Ÿค Ethical considerations are crucial as games influence real-world military strategies.
  • ๐ŸŒ Wargames hold potential applications beyond military, such as crisis management.
  • ๐Ÿ“Š Challenges exist in ensuring the accuracy and effectiveness of wargames.
  • ๐Ÿ” The gaming industry faces a responsibility to engage with the ethical dimensions of wargaming.
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ Current global conflicts influence the perception and urgency of wargaming.
  • ๐Ÿ“š Calls for more academic and public engagement with the ethics of wargaming.

Timeline

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The video discusses how wargaming, the practice of using games to simulate real-world conflicts and strategies, is experiencing a resurgence, with increasing involvement from governments and military organizations worldwide. The historical context is provided, showing how wargaming has influenced major events like World War II. As governments invest more in this practice, there's a shortage of wargaming experts, leading to demand from industries traditionally not involved in wargaming.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    Interviewees in the video highlight the rising demand for wargaming due to the unpredictable geopolitical climate. There's a generational shift where individuals who grew up playing games now integrate gaming into professional practices. The expertise in wargaming is crucial as it offers an economic way to simulate conflicts, especially given the current financial constraints and global uncertainties like high-intensity warfare and resource scarcity.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    While traditional wargames focus on physical combat, modern wargaming involves complex geopolitical scenarios, including influence warfare and cyber warfare. The games simulate situations where countries avoid conventional warfare yet engage in aggressive tactics. There's a focus on experimenting with various simulation models, including matrix games, to adapt to modern conflict scenarios.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:00

    Todayโ€™s wargaming often involves no physical representations of combat and instead deals with intangible conflicts like influence warfare. The UK Ministry of Defence's handbook on influence wargaming is explored as a guide rather than a rulebook, encouraging experimentation. As wargames evolve, so does the need to model increasingly complex modern conflicts involving psychological and cyber components.

  • 00:20:00 - 00:25:00

    Regarding the intersection of commercial gaming and government wargaming, the video explains that governments leverage the commercial gaming industry for innovations, technology, and talent. This overlap prompts ethical considerations for individuals in the gaming industry, as military contracts with game companies, such as Unity, can conflict with personal ethics regarding the use of gaming skills and products in warfare.

  • 00:25:00 - 00:30:00

    The relationship between government wargaming and commercial gaming is outlined, highlighting how innovations and talent from the gaming industry are utilized in military applications. Notably, strategy games from commercial publishers are already used for training purposes within defense sectors. The video argues for awareness and ethical consideration within the gaming community regarding such collaborations.

  • 00:30:00 - 00:35:00

    The development of wargames has historical roots linked to military strategy, which indirectly influenced role-playing games. Thereโ€™s a focus on how historical practices of wargaming have subtly shaped the mainstream gaming industry. The video explores the moral implications of these influences and questions the ethics of turning game design skills into tools for military strategy.

  • 00:35:00 - 00:40:00

    The video explores the troubling overlap between commercial board games and government wargames, tracing influences back to historical wargaming practices. It discusses how core mechanics of games often derive from military strategy games, raising ethical questions about the use of game design in developing tools for warfare. The discussion extends to exploring the role of the gaming industry in shaping narratives around conflict.

  • 00:40:00 - 00:45:00

    The ethical implications of the resurgence of wargaming are debated, with professionals in the field acknowledging both its potential benefits in conflict prevention and its darker aspects of facilitating military tactics. The video critically examines claims that wargames 'save lives,' questioning the actual outcomes and moral responsibilities of designing such games. The dual nature of wargaming as a tool for both peace and conflict is scrutinized.

  • 00:45:00 - 00:50:00

    Despite the potential applications of wargaming beyond military use, its military origins raise ethical concerns. The professionals in the field recognize the double-edged nature of their work. The video contemplates the morality of developing wargames, particularly when outcomes may involve real-world conflicts. It provides a critical perspective on the use and justification of wargames, urging transparency and ethical accountability.

  • 00:50:00 - 00:55:00

    The ethical case for wargames includes their potential to address non-military challenges, but the video questions the true efficacy of wargames. Concerns are raised about whether wargames actually lead to better decision-making or simply create the illusion of preparedness. The historical ineffective use of wargames, exemplified by misunderstandings during conflicts such as the Ukraine war, is used to highlight these challenges.

  • 00:55:00 - 01:00:00

    The video underscores concerns about the effectiveness of wargaming. It critiques the field for its lack of transparency and scientific rigor, questioning whether wargames truly aid in decision-making processes. The challenge of obtaining reliable data from wargames due to military secrecy is discussed, highlighting the difficulty in evaluating their real-world application and effectiveness.

  • 01:00:00 - 01:05:00

    The closure of the video emphasizes the need for the gaming industry to engage with the ethical ramifications of wargaming instead of ignoring them. The importance of informed discourse on how gaming expertise is used in wargaming is stressed. It calls for the games industry to consider its potential influence over wargaming's evolution, advocating for proactive involvement and ethical vigilance.

  • 01:05:00 - 01:12:31

    The video concludes by encouraging the gaming community to recognize its responsibility in shaping how games are used in wargaming contexts. It advocates for awareness and active participation from the industry to ensure that gaming innovations are not used unethically in military applications. There's a call to leverage the industry's influence to support ethical standards in both gaming and wargaming collaborations.

Show more

Mind Map

Video Q&A

  • What is the video about?

    The video discusses the resurgence of government wargaming and its implications for the games industry.

  • What are wargames?

    Wargames are simulations resembling video games, board games, or role-playing games used by governments for planning and practicing military strategies and responses to various scenarios.

  • Why are wargames gaining popularity again?

    Wargames are resurging due to the current unstable strategic environment and the potential cost-effectiveness in training and strategic planning.

  • How do wargames affect the commercial games industry?

    There is a significant overlap between wargaming and the games industry, with governments utilizing game technology and expertise, and vice versa.

  • Are wargames ethically problematic?

    The ethical implications of wargames are debated, with concerns about their use in military applications and the potential normalization of warfare.

  • Can wargames be used for non-military purposes?

    Yes, wargames have potential applications in crisis management, logistics, healthcare, and more, beyond military purposes.

  • What challenges exist in wargaming?

    Challenges include ensuring accurate simulation and learning, preventing bias, and dealing with the military's penchant for secrecy.

  • Do wargames actually work?

    The effectiveness of wargames can vary; if poorly designed or executed, they can lead to incorrect conclusions.

  • What is the historical significance of wargames?

    Wargames have influenced military strategy and decision-making throughout history and have origins that trace back to Prussia.

  • Why is there a need for ethical discussion in wargaming?

    As governments increasingly integrate game technologies, it is important for the games industry to address ethical considerations of their applications.

View more video summaries

Get instant access to free YouTube video summaries powered by AI!
Subtitles
en
Auto Scroll:
  • 00:00:00
    - You know how PMG videos are either like fun deep dives
  • 00:00:03
    into cool communities
  • 00:00:04
    or we cover just the heaviest **** imaginable?
  • 00:00:09
    Yep.
  • 00:00:10
    This is a video about how government wargaming
  • 00:00:12
    is on the rise again like it's never been before
  • 00:00:15
    and how that stands to affect your and my games industry.
  • 00:00:19
    And by wargaming,
  • 00:00:20
    I mean countries using things
  • 00:00:22
    that resemble video games, board games, role playing games,
  • 00:00:24
    and LARPs to try and practise, plan,
  • 00:00:27
    and preempt things like disasters,
  • 00:00:30
    political manoeuvring, and, most of all, conflict.
  • 00:00:34
    Now, historically,
  • 00:00:35
    the popularity of wargames has always ebbed and flowed.
  • 00:00:39
    You have times like World War II,
  • 00:00:41
    where wargames are regularly argued
  • 00:00:43
    to have changed the course of world history.
  • 00:00:45
    But then you also have times like the 1970s, when,
  • 00:00:48
    after the disaster of Vietnam
  • 00:00:50
    and with computers getting more and more powerful,
  • 00:00:53
    governments began thinking that these more primitive games
  • 00:00:55
    were all maybe a waste of taxpayer money.
  • 00:00:59
    But today, governments are bringing their games
  • 00:01:02
    and their game designers back out of retirement.
  • 00:01:05
    In 2015, the Obama administration's Department of Defence
  • 00:01:10
    announced that $525 million was to be given to the Pentagon
  • 00:01:15
    to develop its wargaming capabilities.
  • 00:01:17
    And this was like a starting pistol for governments
  • 00:01:21
    and military alliances all over the globe.
  • 00:01:24
    Today, there is simply more demand
  • 00:01:26
    for wargaming designers than there is supply.
  • 00:01:30
    A fact that People make Games confirmed
  • 00:01:32
    by heading to the Connections Wargaming Conference
  • 00:01:35
    for wargaming professionals,
  • 00:01:37
    where we found a generation
  • 00:01:39
    of veteran designers unable to retire,
  • 00:01:42
    desperate to pass their skills to the next generation,
  • 00:01:45
    and maybe that means you.
  • 00:01:48
    Because while wargaming is a practise
  • 00:01:51
    dating back hundreds of years,
  • 00:01:52
    today is the first time the practise has come back
  • 00:01:55
    to find itself adjacent
  • 00:01:57
    to a hyper-advanced commercial games industry,
  • 00:02:00
    with ideas, engineering, designers,
  • 00:02:03
    and game facilitators all ready for the taking.
  • 00:02:06
    And I personally think it's pretty important
  • 00:02:08
    that we as a community
  • 00:02:10
    figure out how we feel about that.
  • 00:02:12
    Because, listen, for this video,
  • 00:02:14
    People make Games was given access
  • 00:02:16
    to the UK's Defence Science and Technology Laboratory,
  • 00:02:20
    where, among other jobs,
  • 00:02:21
    scientists and engineers design weapon systems,
  • 00:02:25
    so the lab could show off their growing wargaming facility
  • 00:02:28
    to People Make Games' audience.
  • 00:02:30
    And me and my cameraman did not stop
  • 00:02:33
    having incredibly complicated feelings about that
  • 00:02:35
    for the entire time that we were there.
  • 00:02:38
    It was exactly like visiting
  • 00:02:40
    a video game development studio
  • 00:02:41
    but in some kind of "Doctor Who" parallel universe
  • 00:02:44
    where games weren't made for fun,
  • 00:02:46
    but for the most serious purpose imaginable.
  • 00:02:50
    So, listen, before I kick this video off properly,
  • 00:02:53
    we set out to make something like a documentary
  • 00:02:55
    on this subject, right,
  • 00:02:56
    but it's shaken out more like a video essay
  • 00:02:59
    for a few reasons.
  • 00:03:00
    So, first off,
  • 00:03:00
    we quickly realised that it was gonna be impossible
  • 00:03:03
    for us to capture this story
  • 00:03:05
    for an audience of gamers such as yourself
  • 00:03:07
    without me talking about my personal experience
  • 00:03:10
    that was so weird of being a gamer in these spaces.
  • 00:03:15
    Also, as you'll very quickly see,
  • 00:03:17
    this story is a complete moral labyrinth
  • 00:03:20
    that it just felt cruel to leave you in alone.
  • 00:03:23
    So, instead, I'm gonna be sharing my ethical standpoint
  • 00:03:27
    on this story as we go through it.
  • 00:03:29
    Please don't cancel me.
  • 00:03:30
    Also, the more research we did into this story,
  • 00:03:34
    the more we became part of this story,
  • 00:03:37
    which isn't as crazy as it sounds.
  • 00:03:40
    In this video,
  • 00:03:41
    I'm also gonna be explaining the secret backdoor
  • 00:03:44
    in the fun-time games industry
  • 00:03:46
    that has always led to and from government wargaming.
  • 00:03:50
    I'll teach you how the games that you love
  • 00:03:52
    have been shaped by government wargames.
  • 00:03:54
    And I will explain how this is our opportunity
  • 00:03:58
    or curse that we, as a community,
  • 00:04:01
    can shape government wargames right back.
  • 00:04:04
    Because at the extreme end, today, in 2024,
  • 00:04:07
    your country's wargames might now be something
  • 00:04:10
    that you could get a career in,
  • 00:04:12
    or that could otherwise define your career in games
  • 00:04:15
    by you deciding that you are ethically opposed
  • 00:04:18
    to your labour being used by the sector in any way.
  • 00:04:22
    Never in the history of People Make Games
  • 00:04:24
    has our team had such complicated feelings
  • 00:04:27
    while researching a story.
  • 00:04:29
    So we just figured all we could do for you
  • 00:04:32
    is prove to you that wargaming is coming back
  • 00:04:35
    and trying to equip you
  • 00:04:36
    so you can know how you feel about that.
  • 00:04:39
    Oh, and stick around
  • 00:04:41
    to find out why this promotional ruler I was given
  • 00:04:45
    is maybe the most haunting object
  • 00:04:47
    I have ever been given by anyone
  • 00:04:50
    and why it summarises a good chunk of this debate.
  • 00:04:54
    (upbeat music)
  • 00:05:02
    What evidence can you give,
  • 00:05:03
    would you give people that wargaming
  • 00:05:05
    is kind of on the rise or the resurgence?
  • 00:05:08
    - That's really simple.
  • 00:05:09
    So I'm a deliverer of wargaming facilitation and design,
  • 00:05:13
    and I have not got time to breathe.
  • 00:05:16
    I'm trying to retire; I can't.
  • 00:05:19
    The supply of wargame experts
  • 00:05:23
    is way too short
  • 00:05:24
    and the demand for good wargames is way too high.
  • 00:05:28
    - Frightening.
  • 00:05:29
    So let's kick off with the question of: Why?
  • 00:05:32
    Why is this happening now?
  • 00:05:34
    (light mysterious music)
  • 00:05:36
    The answer to that question doesn't totally exist,
  • 00:05:38
    but we called up an expert to give us their best guess:
  • 00:05:41
    David Banks,
  • 00:05:42
    a lecturer in the brand new field of wargame studies
  • 00:05:46
    at King's College London.
  • 00:05:48
    - I think there's two things.
  • 00:05:49
    I think one of them is the current strategic environment
  • 00:05:52
    is so wobbly and weird
  • 00:05:54
    that I think that, you know,
  • 00:05:55
    major states like the US or the UK, or whoever it is,
  • 00:05:58
    are kind of not able to rely
  • 00:06:00
    on some of their old forms of forecasting and analysis.
  • 00:06:03
    Our old models just don't seem to be hitting the target,
  • 00:06:06
    so let's try everything.
  • 00:06:08
    It's a kind of a try-everything approach.
  • 00:06:10
    I think the other bit, though,
  • 00:06:11
    I think there might be a generational thing,
  • 00:06:12
    where we haven't put our games away.
  • 00:06:14
    You know, I think we grew up as gamers
  • 00:06:16
    and then we are still gamers.
  • 00:06:18
    And so I think there's a kind of a willingness
  • 00:06:20
    to accept gaming just as a concept.
  • 00:06:22
    - We're in interesting times because,
  • 00:06:24
    I'm not gonna talk politics here,
  • 00:06:26
    but not so long ago,
  • 00:06:27
    where a certain prime minister and a certain chancellor
  • 00:06:29
    said the days of tanks crossing planes were over,
  • 00:06:32
    and very shortly thereafter,
  • 00:06:34
    we saw the invasion of Ukraine.
  • 00:06:36
    We are seeing high-intensity war fighting in Europe again,
  • 00:06:40
    which many people believed would not happen.
  • 00:06:42
    We're addressing concerns
  • 00:06:44
    where there might be war fighting
  • 00:06:46
    in the Indo-Pacific region.
  • 00:06:48
    We are now facing a situation,
  • 00:06:49
    under financially very constrained times,
  • 00:06:52
    where we are looking at war in Europe.
  • 00:06:54
    And the potential for that escalating
  • 00:06:56
    and spilling over and pulling in more of Europe,
  • 00:06:58
    it's not impossible.
  • 00:06:59
    Besides which there are many other crisis points
  • 00:07:01
    around the world related to climate change,
  • 00:07:03
    water and energy security, food security,
  • 00:07:06
    large migrations of people.
  • 00:07:07
    We are looking at increasing likelihoods
  • 00:07:08
    of conflict in places,
  • 00:07:10
    and some of that may be state-on-state,
  • 00:07:11
    high-intensity warfare.
  • 00:07:13
    We're not prepared for it.
  • 00:07:14
    So one way we can address that gap in a very,
  • 00:07:16
    very economic fashion
  • 00:07:18
    is by wargaming high-intensity conflict.
  • 00:07:21
    - In other words, everything to do with wars is expensive,
  • 00:07:24
    but everything to do with wargames is cheap.
  • 00:07:27
    So if wargames can make what you build, where you place it,
  • 00:07:31
    or how you use it even fractionally more efficient,
  • 00:07:34
    you'd be a real bozo not to try.
  • 00:07:37
    Now, basic question number two:
  • 00:07:39
    What is wargaming?
  • 00:07:41
    Or at least what does it look like in the 21st century?
  • 00:07:45
    (whimsical music)
  • 00:07:47
    So you might be imagining an older white man
  • 00:07:49
    with facial hair pushing little boats
  • 00:07:51
    and planes around a map.
  • 00:07:52
    And no one was more surprised than me
  • 00:07:54
    to find out that that image
  • 00:07:56
    is still absolutely part of 21st century wargaming.
  • 00:08:00
    At the Connections Conference,
  • 00:08:00
    I saw a new design from a man considered by some
  • 00:08:03
    to be the best naval wargame designer alive today.
  • 00:08:06
    And his work looked, from a distance,
  • 00:08:09
    like a hex and counter wargame from the 1970s.
  • 00:08:12
    I was also taken aback by a cutting-edge tool
  • 00:08:14
    shown to me at the Defence Science and Technology Lab
  • 00:08:17
    that was used for, among other things,
  • 00:08:19
    modelling lines of sight and communication,
  • 00:08:21
    which I could not look at without being reminded
  • 00:08:23
    of one of the greatest pieces of game design history ever,
  • 00:08:27
    1913 design, "Little Wars,"
  • 00:08:30
    by the author H. G. Wells.
  • 00:08:33
    Did you know H. G. Wells also popularised
  • 00:08:34
    the concept of time travel?
  • 00:08:36
    (mysterious music continues)
  • 00:08:37
    - [Narrator] It became intoxicating.
  • 00:08:39
    - What a guy.
  • 00:08:40
    Anyway, that today we still play
  • 00:08:42
    some of these old-fashioned looking wargames
  • 00:08:44
    of people pushing little boats around
  • 00:08:46
    does make sense because this area contains
  • 00:08:49
    some of the most well-documented success stories
  • 00:08:51
    in the history of the field.
  • 00:08:53
    Gaming journalist Simon Parkin
  • 00:08:55
    recently wrote a book called "A Game of Birds and Wolves,"
  • 00:08:58
    which documents the story
  • 00:09:00
    of the Western Approaches Tactical Unit in World War II,
  • 00:09:03
    which was mostly staffed
  • 00:09:04
    by the Women's Royal Naval Service, or WRNS.
  • 00:09:07
    They created wargames to help Britain
  • 00:09:09
    better survive submarine warfare,
  • 00:09:11
    which was threatening a famine in the UK.
  • 00:09:13
    But also Germany had developed such good U-boat tactics
  • 00:09:17
    by wargaming it themselves.
  • 00:09:19
    Plenty has also been written
  • 00:09:20
    about the US Navy's intense wargaming
  • 00:09:23
    before they commenced their island hopping
  • 00:09:25
    across the Pacific,
  • 00:09:26
    where they pushed the Japanese navy back to Japan.
  • 00:09:29
    In this front of the war,
  • 00:09:30
    the United States found that the Japanese
  • 00:09:32
    could do almost nothing to surprise them
  • 00:09:35
    because they'd simulated the strategy so many times.
  • 00:09:38
    It's not all success stories.
  • 00:09:40
    Wargaming is also what led Japan
  • 00:09:42
    to think that Pearl Harbour was a good idea,
  • 00:09:45
    arguably a misplay from Imperial Japan.
  • 00:09:47
    However, while traditional games like this
  • 00:09:50
    still make up an enormous amount
  • 00:09:51
    of today's wargame interest and funding,
  • 00:09:54
    with David Banks telling PMG
  • 00:09:56
    that today it feels like, quote,
  • 00:09:57
    "Every game being commissioned
  • 00:09:59
    is a South China Sea game",
  • 00:10:01
    simulating various flashpoints around Taiwan.
  • 00:10:04
    Today, many wargames don't feature moving units
  • 00:10:07
    of any kind around a board.
  • 00:10:09
    They might not even have a board,
  • 00:10:11
    and that's because today a lot of conflict
  • 00:10:13
    sees countries being aggressive towards one another
  • 00:10:16
    without firing a shot.
  • 00:10:18
    One such new battlefield has the term influence warfare.
  • 00:10:23
    - Looking at things away from that kinetic sphere,
  • 00:10:26
    so things that are perhaps more to do with the human psyche
  • 00:10:28
    or perhaps we can add things on the internet,
  • 00:10:30
    so softwares and behaviours on the internet,
  • 00:10:32
    how it fits into conventional warfare
  • 00:10:34
    is the fact that it can, you know,
  • 00:10:35
    send a message or persuade an action
  • 00:10:39
    or a country to take a particular course of action
  • 00:10:42
    should they want to.
  • 00:10:44
    - For example, in recent years,
  • 00:10:45
    a lot of ink has been spilled about Russia's attempts
  • 00:10:48
    to manipulate democracy in the United States
  • 00:10:50
    by compromising individual policy makers
  • 00:10:53
    or funding whole troll farms full of Russian citizens
  • 00:10:56
    who then spend all day on the American internet
  • 00:10:58
    trying to shape civic discussion.
  • 00:11:01
    Or on the week that I was writing this script,
  • 00:11:04
    there was a Guardian article
  • 00:11:05
    about the alleged new Russian practise
  • 00:11:07
    of rather than using spies,
  • 00:11:09
    as would be the case in the Cold War,
  • 00:11:11
    they're now allegedly using Bitcoin
  • 00:11:13
    to pay would-be saboteurs to do stuff
  • 00:11:15
    like enact some performative antisemitism
  • 00:11:18
    on a Holocaust memorial outside of Paris.
  • 00:11:21
    How do you fight something like this,
  • 00:11:23
    a brand new kind of warfare
  • 00:11:24
    that is leaving the countries on the receiving end
  • 00:11:27
    shocked and flatfooted?
  • 00:11:29
    Well, so thinking in the sector goes,
  • 00:11:32
    a good start would be to game it,
  • 00:11:35
    just like the WRNS did.
  • 00:11:36
    Great.
  • 00:11:37
    But how do you game that?
  • 00:11:39
    And the short answer is we're still figuring that out.
  • 00:11:42
    But the start of the process is stuff like this.
  • 00:11:46
    Published just last year,
  • 00:11:48
    this is the UK Ministry of Defense's
  • 00:11:50
    new "Influence Wargaming Handbook,"
  • 00:11:52
    a document designed for defence and security personnel,
  • 00:11:55
    exploring why they should maybe start practising this game
  • 00:11:59
    that it would appear
  • 00:12:00
    the Russians are currently beating them at.
  • 00:12:02
    But this, this is not a rule book.
  • 00:12:04
    This is just the start of a discussion
  • 00:12:06
    arguing what we have to gain from these games
  • 00:12:08
    and pitfalls we should avoid.
  • 00:12:10
    As to what the games themselves would look like,
  • 00:12:12
    today we're in an era of experimentation.
  • 00:12:15
    And while people do make video games
  • 00:12:17
    to do complex simulations or mathematics,
  • 00:12:19
    a lot of the time governments
  • 00:12:20
    are still making tabletop games
  • 00:12:23
    for the same reason that a lot of video game developers
  • 00:12:25
    do paper prototyping.
  • 00:12:26
    It lets you get games on their feet quicker
  • 00:12:29
    so you can test theories, iterate on designs,
  • 00:12:32
    and start learning.
  • 00:12:33
    Today, one of the most popular new kinds of games
  • 00:12:36
    is what's called a matrix game.
  • 00:12:38
    And this is so close to a tabletop role playing game,
  • 00:12:41
    it's kind of unreal.
  • 00:12:42
    In a matrix game,
  • 00:12:43
    you have two teams competing against each other
  • 00:12:45
    with different objectives.
  • 00:12:46
    There may be resources or not.
  • 00:12:48
    There may be a map or not.
  • 00:12:49
    You might represent something as large as competing nations;
  • 00:12:52
    or in one matrix game I heard of teaching cybersecurity,
  • 00:12:55
    one player is a computer hacker
  • 00:12:57
    trying to destroy a shipment of refrigerated medicine
  • 00:13:00
    being kept in a port.
  • 00:13:02
    Finally, you then have another human being,
  • 00:13:04
    a neutral adjudicator,
  • 00:13:05
    who ostensibly knows the most about this subject matter.
  • 00:13:09
    Teams then take turns describing their action,
  • 00:13:11
    which might be anything, for example:
  • 00:13:13
    "I'm gonna get a mole to get a job in this port,"
  • 00:13:16
    and they then offer three justificatory arguments
  • 00:13:19
    as to why it would work.
  • 00:13:21
    The other team then states three arguments
  • 00:13:23
    as to why the action wouldn't work.
  • 00:13:25
    The adjudicator then weighs these arguments
  • 00:13:27
    and turns them into a modifier you add to the roll of a die.
  • 00:13:31
    And the action succeeds or it doesn't
  • 00:13:34
    and then the next player takes their turn
  • 00:13:36
    and you go back and forth until someone wins
  • 00:13:39
    or you learned enough.
  • 00:13:40
    But also, if you keep detailed notes on these games,
  • 00:13:44
    as you run the game over and over and over,
  • 00:13:46
    you'll steadily generate a list of actions
  • 00:13:49
    each side might reasonably take
  • 00:13:51
    as well as the likelihood of success
  • 00:13:52
    and consequences for all of them, and then, in theory,
  • 00:13:55
    you'll be able to play this game
  • 00:13:57
    without the subject matter expert at all.
  • 00:13:59
    You'll have something like an informative board game
  • 00:14:02
    where players simply choose their action from a big list.
  • 00:14:06
    However, in addition to what genre of game
  • 00:14:09
    you should use to model a problem
  • 00:14:10
    being a source of endless discussion in this sector,
  • 00:14:13
    there is also the unanswerable question
  • 00:14:16
    of how big these games should be.
  • 00:14:20
    Let's actually get Anni to animate this as well.
  • 00:14:22
    So let's say you're making a game about influence warfare
  • 00:14:24
    between two countries, for two players, with one game master.
  • 00:14:28
    But if the influence warfare
  • 00:14:29
    affects the politics of those countries,
  • 00:14:31
    that's also surely something
  • 00:14:33
    that needs to be modelled, ideally in parallel.
  • 00:14:35
    That would be more instructive.
  • 00:14:36
    So let's take two more players who play the political game.
  • 00:14:39
    So we now have a five-player game
  • 00:14:40
    with two teams of two.
  • 00:14:42
    But, you know,
  • 00:14:43
    there's also that other country
  • 00:14:44
    they both share a border with that's very influential;
  • 00:14:46
    we should model that as well.
  • 00:14:47
    So now we're up to seven players.
  • 00:14:49
    At which point we maybe need two GMs, maybe three.
  • 00:14:52
    Ah, but you know what affects all of this
  • 00:14:53
    is everyone's cyberspace warfare.
  • 00:14:56
    So let's add a cyberspace warfare player to each team.
  • 00:14:59
    Then we really gotta get the local superpower in there,
  • 00:15:01
    so that's 13 players,
  • 00:15:03
    chuck another two GMs in,
  • 00:15:05
    and so on and so forth
  • 00:15:06
    until you've got a game that teeters
  • 00:15:07
    on the edge of total chaos,
  • 00:15:09
    that takes all day to play
  • 00:15:11
    and requires whole teams of adjudicators,
  • 00:15:14
    at which point you probably need extra people
  • 00:15:15
    just to handle the catering
  • 00:15:17
    and to tell everyone where they need to stand at what time.
  • 00:15:20
    - This other one we did for NATO,
  • 00:15:22
    which I have the pieces here,
  • 00:15:25
    was a single game about Russia versus NATO
  • 00:15:29
    squabbling over Finland.
  • 00:15:30
    Finland's exceeded to NATO.
  • 00:15:32
    The brief was to make a game about crisis dynamics,
  • 00:15:35
    signalling dynamics, multi-domain operations,
  • 00:15:38
    so space, cyber, info ops, logistics,
  • 00:15:42
    but not kinetic warfare because they have those games.
  • 00:15:44
    And so that was fine.
  • 00:15:46
    So what what I did is, to try to keep the simplicity, is,
  • 00:15:49
    it wasn't simple for me,
  • 00:15:50
    but it was a lot of miniature games, smaller games.
  • 00:15:52
    So, you know, you're playing the cyber game
  • 00:15:54
    or you're playing the space game,
  • 00:15:56
    or you're playing the command game,
  • 00:15:57
    and then all those games
  • 00:15:59
    periodically transfer information to each other,
  • 00:16:02
    which actually put a huge amount of onus
  • 00:16:04
    on the facilitation side.
  • 00:16:06
    - [Quinns] That's more than two players?
  • 00:16:07
    - That was about 50 players.
  • 00:16:09
    - So while wargaming might have started
  • 00:16:12
    with two Prussian generals
  • 00:16:13
    pushing little blocks around,
  • 00:16:15
    today it can be used to model
  • 00:16:17
    a much wider variety of problems
  • 00:16:19
    facing a state or a military.
  • 00:16:21
    It might take any format of game
  • 00:16:22
    and it might feature any number of players.
  • 00:16:25
    So in terms of me helping you to visualise
  • 00:16:27
    what games governments are playing with your tax dollars,
  • 00:16:31
    I'm aware that's all super unhelpful,
  • 00:16:33
    but it does convey something that I felt
  • 00:16:35
    in all of my field trips to spend time
  • 00:16:37
    with wargaming professionals,
  • 00:16:38
    which is these people would be the first to admit to you
  • 00:16:41
    that they don't fully know how it works.
  • 00:16:45
    They just believe so strongly that it does work.
  • 00:16:47
    A lot of these professionals are visibly happy
  • 00:16:49
    to dedicate their professional careers
  • 00:16:51
    to trying to make sense of it
  • 00:16:53
    or just trying to deploy this inscrutable-ass power.
  • 00:16:57
    Also, as we'll get to later in the video,
  • 00:17:00
    many of the young people I spoke to in the sector
  • 00:17:02
    were equally excited to explore
  • 00:17:03
    the applications of wargaming outside of conflict
  • 00:17:07
    to try and make the world a better place.
  • 00:17:08
    And everyone was keen to talk to me
  • 00:17:10
    about games used by Britain's National Health Service
  • 00:17:13
    to better survive COVID
  • 00:17:15
    or games about logistics to help charities
  • 00:17:17
    to get their aid to the right place.
  • 00:17:19
    All these people would also wincingly admit to me
  • 00:17:22
    that today almost all of the funding in the sector
  • 00:17:25
    comes from the military.
  • 00:17:27
    So let's move on to the next chapter of this video.
  • 00:17:30
    How does this mass injection of government interest
  • 00:17:33
    and money into wargaming stand to affect
  • 00:17:36
    your and my games industry?
  • 00:17:38
    (inquisitive music)
  • 00:17:42
    "Quinns, what are you on about modelling military hardware?
  • 00:17:44
    Most of us can't model a successful car
  • 00:17:46
    in Tears of the Kingdom.
  • 00:17:47
    (explosion booms)
  • 00:17:49
    Unfortunately, let's do a nice Venn diagram,
  • 00:17:52
    thanks, Anni.
  • 00:17:52
    You might think of government wargaming
  • 00:17:54
    and your and my commercial games industry as separate;
  • 00:17:57
    they share the name of games,
  • 00:17:58
    but they're completely different fields.
  • 00:18:00
    That is categorically not true.
  • 00:18:04
    There is a big slice here where we cross over.
  • 00:18:07
    It is here that you will find the reasons
  • 00:18:09
    that professional wargaming will take an interest
  • 00:18:12
    in hiring gamers,
  • 00:18:13
    will look to take our innovations in tech,
  • 00:18:15
    and also why our games have taken
  • 00:18:17
    a lot of our innovations from wargames,
  • 00:18:19
    and why if you are ethically opposed
  • 00:18:21
    to some aspect of the practise of wargaming,
  • 00:18:23
    you should figure that out right now
  • 00:18:25
    before you end up in a situation
  • 00:18:27
    like the staff at game engine developer Unity when, in 2021,
  • 00:18:30
    they were blindsided
  • 00:18:31
    to discover their employer had signed contracts
  • 00:18:34
    with the US's Department of Defence.
  • 00:18:36
    Do you remember that story?
  • 00:18:37
    We all shook our heads in disbelief.
  • 00:18:39
    And then within a year,
  • 00:18:41
    there was another story that Unity had signed
  • 00:18:43
    yet more even more lucrative contracts with the DOD.
  • 00:18:47
    And once again, we all shook our heads in disbelief.
  • 00:18:49
    But listen to me, listen,
  • 00:18:51
    this is gonna keep happening
  • 00:18:52
    and the checks are gonna keep getting bigger.
  • 00:18:55
    Billionaire Palmer Luckey,
  • 00:18:56
    designer of the Oculus Rift
  • 00:18:58
    and famous for that Time magazine cover,
  • 00:19:00
    announced this month that the new VR headset
  • 00:19:04
    his company is working on
  • 00:19:05
    is being driven by military applications.
  • 00:19:08
    - So I'm actually building a new headset right now.
  • 00:19:11
    It's driven by- - Whoo!
  • 00:19:12
    - Yeah, yeah.
  • 00:19:13
    It's driven by military requirements,
  • 00:19:14
    but it's also gonna be used for non-military stuff.
  • 00:19:17
    And it's really cool.
  • 00:19:19
    It's really something.
  • 00:19:20
    - How do you imagine companies like these two might adapt
  • 00:19:22
    if World War III were to break out tomorrow?
  • 00:19:25
    And let's not forget that in World War II,
  • 00:19:27
    companies like Mitsubishi and Ford
  • 00:19:29
    quickly pivoted to making tanks.
  • 00:19:31
    But this is just technology.
  • 00:19:33
    Let's talk about actual games.
  • 00:19:35
    Did you know that government agencies
  • 00:19:37
    can buy professional versions of strategy games
  • 00:19:40
    that you and I can buy on Steam
  • 00:19:42
    that enable them to change the statistics
  • 00:19:45
    of military hardware in the game
  • 00:19:47
    to perfectly match the data they have available
  • 00:19:50
    on different weapon systems?
  • 00:19:52
    It's true.
  • 00:19:52
    At the Connections Conference,
  • 00:19:53
    I attended a talk by someone
  • 00:19:55
    from strategy publisher Slitherine,
  • 00:19:57
    where he told us, quote,
  • 00:19:58
    "The Pentagon said they were getting more use
  • 00:20:00
    from the Slitherine games they downloaded from Steam
  • 00:20:03
    than the games they commissioned from wargame designers."
  • 00:20:06
    That is nuts, but it makes sense.
  • 00:20:09
    If you are a video game developer,
  • 00:20:11
    you will know the awesome amount of time
  • 00:20:13
    and money and expertise that goes into developing an engine,
  • 00:20:17
    an interface, a simulation of a gun, or a plane,
  • 00:20:19
    or a vehicle, audio acoustics, net code.
  • 00:20:22
    In terms of hours of expertise invested into their creation,
  • 00:20:25
    video games are some of the cathedrals of the modern age.
  • 00:20:29
    You think a government is gonna try doing that?
  • 00:20:31
    If I have to use one of my country's websites
  • 00:20:34
    and it's not ****,
  • 00:20:35
    that's such a surprise,
  • 00:20:37
    I feel a flash of patriotism.
  • 00:20:39
    Of course governments are taking stuff
  • 00:20:41
    made by the commercial games industry
  • 00:20:42
    and then tweaking it.
  • 00:20:43
    That costs them half as much
  • 00:20:45
    and it works twice as well.
  • 00:20:47
    But as we just established,
  • 00:20:49
    a lot of government wargames are not video games, right?
  • 00:20:52
    They're tabletop games and board games.
  • 00:20:55
    (light dramatic music)
  • 00:20:56
    This is where this story gets a little more personal for me.
  • 00:20:58
    So this Connections Conference
  • 00:21:00
    that People Make Games went to,
  • 00:21:01
    it was an intimidating event to go to, right?
  • 00:21:04
    It took place at Sandhurst,
  • 00:21:05
    a historic military academy
  • 00:21:07
    that has been training officers of the British Army
  • 00:21:09
    for 250 years.
  • 00:21:11
    Attending the conference
  • 00:21:12
    with special advisors to governments,
  • 00:21:14
    military personnel from America,
  • 00:21:15
    specialists who had travelled
  • 00:21:16
    from as far as Australia and Japan.
  • 00:21:19
    And a lot of these people knew who I was
  • 00:21:22
    from my work with board game YouTube channel
  • 00:21:25
    Shut Up & Sit Down.
  • 00:21:26
    You see, what united this community
  • 00:21:29
    wasn't just that they made wargames to spec for a living
  • 00:21:32
    for clients ranging from governments to militaries, to NGOs,
  • 00:21:35
    to corporations.
  • 00:21:36
    For many of them, including the organisers,
  • 00:21:38
    they were simply passionate about some aspect of gaming,
  • 00:21:41
    full stop.
  • 00:21:42
    The event had a social mixer
  • 00:21:44
    that was just a board game night.
  • 00:21:46
    And to some extent,
  • 00:21:47
    that's why they're good at their job,
  • 00:21:49
    because if they're commissioned to make
  • 00:21:51
    or run some board game about political manoeuvring,
  • 00:21:53
    they can pull in innovations from "Diplomacy,"
  • 00:21:56
    to "Twilight Imperium," to "John Company,"
  • 00:21:58
    to the "King's Dilemma."
  • 00:21:59
    One of the games I saw at DSTL
  • 00:22:01
    was a game about British Air Force bases
  • 00:22:03
    having to make difficult decisions
  • 00:22:05
    about resource allocation during a crisis.
  • 00:22:07
    And the designer proudly told me
  • 00:22:09
    he used the infection system from board game Pandemic
  • 00:22:13
    to simulate stress to nodal points of a network.
  • 00:22:17
    And what really (beep) me up was learning
  • 00:22:18
    that this influence goes both ways.
  • 00:22:21
    One of the most innovative commercial board game designers
  • 00:22:25
    Volko Ruhnke was a figure I had been making fun of
  • 00:22:28
    and praising on the Shut Up & Sit Down Podcast
  • 00:22:30
    for a decade for making games that were fascinating
  • 00:22:33
    but maybe just a bit too complicated for me.
  • 00:22:35
    I found out at Connections
  • 00:22:35
    that Volko Ruhnke used to be an analyst for the CIA,
  • 00:22:40
    making games for them.
  • 00:22:42
    So there I was, on Shut Up & Sit Down,
  • 00:22:44
    covering Volko's games about counterinsurgency and going,
  • 00:22:47
    "Man, where does this guy get his ideas from?"
  • 00:22:50
    But check it out.
  • 00:22:50
    The mechanics in these games about counterinsurgency
  • 00:22:53
    then got reworked by a different designer
  • 00:22:56
    into a game called Root,
  • 00:22:58
    a great board game that's about a counterinsurgency
  • 00:23:01
    among sweet little woodland creatures.
  • 00:23:03
    And Root now has a video game adaptation and a TTRPG.
  • 00:23:07
    And I personally know video game designers
  • 00:23:10
    who are working on designs inspired by Root.
  • 00:23:13
    You sound crazy when you talk about Root
  • 00:23:15
    being a product of the CIA.
  • 00:23:17
    But that's this story, it's crazy-making.
  • 00:23:20
    More uncannily still,
  • 00:23:22
    one of the most beloved videos
  • 00:23:24
    that Shut Up & Sit Down ever did
  • 00:23:25
    was where we went to play something called a mega game
  • 00:23:29
    about aliens invading the Earth.
  • 00:23:31
    Everyone was putting those things down,
  • 00:23:33
    people were yelling at me.
  • 00:23:34
    Forgive the quality of this video;
  • 00:23:35
    it was a different time.
  • 00:23:36
    The game was called "Watch the Skies,"
  • 00:23:38
    and it was a huge game played on your feet
  • 00:23:40
    with dozens of players,
  • 00:23:41
    that's a bit like playing Model UN meets XCOM.
  • 00:23:45
    It was such a popular video
  • 00:23:46
    that got so much attention to the game
  • 00:23:48
    that both the game and the video got a sequel
  • 00:23:51
    where the designers ran Watch The Skies again,
  • 00:23:53
    but this time it had hundreds of players.
  • 00:23:55
    And our coverage telling people
  • 00:23:57
    about these things called mega games
  • 00:23:58
    led to the creation of mega games societies
  • 00:24:00
    all over the world
  • 00:24:01
    and opened countless people's minds
  • 00:24:03
    of what a game can even be.
  • 00:24:06
    And the designers of Watch The Skies,
  • 00:24:07
    who I didn't pay too much thought to
  • 00:24:09
    when we made the video back in 2012,
  • 00:24:10
    called themselves the UK Society of Mega Game Makers,
  • 00:24:14
    and they were these eccentric, older British gentlemen.
  • 00:24:17
    Now, this is only really gonna blow your mind
  • 00:24:19
    if you're a Shut Up & Sit Down fan,
  • 00:24:21
    but the key organiser
  • 00:24:23
    of the Connections Wargaming Conference
  • 00:24:26
    was the designer of Watch the Skies.
  • 00:24:29
    And the UK Society of Mega Game Makers
  • 00:24:31
    was an organisation that was created for fun
  • 00:24:33
    by wargaming professionals
  • 00:24:35
    using their experience running large,
  • 00:24:37
    on-your-feet political games for governments.
  • 00:24:41
    And the reason that these people were so successful
  • 00:24:43
    in their career as professional wargamers
  • 00:24:45
    and also were able to invent this thing called a mega game
  • 00:24:48
    that inspired people all over the planet
  • 00:24:49
    is because the skills involved are one and the same.
  • 00:24:52
    It's the same discipline.
  • 00:24:53
    It's all just game design, immersing the player,
  • 00:24:56
    then fine tuning the experience through iteration. (sighs)
  • 00:24:59
    But that's just my personal tale of terror.
  • 00:25:02
    Lemme tell you,
  • 00:25:02
    the ancestry of gaming as a whole
  • 00:25:05
    is completely tangled up with mankind's desire
  • 00:25:09
    to study war.
  • 00:25:10
    Please allow me to teach you a little bit
  • 00:25:13
    about gaming's family tree
  • 00:25:14
    by explaining how we could have never had
  • 00:25:16
    betitted kung fu experts Tifa from Final Fantasy VII
  • 00:25:20
    (dramatic music)
  • 00:25:22
    without the existence of king of Prussia
  • 00:25:25
    Frederick William III.
  • 00:25:26
    (comical music)
  • 00:25:27
    So, listen, in the early 1800s,
  • 00:25:29
    a bunch of German states, including Prussia,
  • 00:25:31
    were trying to mod chess into a game
  • 00:25:34
    that could better simulate war
  • 00:25:35
    by adding rules for terrain
  • 00:25:37
    and changing the rules of units.
  • 00:25:38
    And in 1812, the Prussian military is like,
  • 00:25:41
    "This is all way too abstract.
  • 00:25:43
    In real life, there is no grid
  • 00:25:45
    and you don't have perfect mind control
  • 00:25:47
    over what all of your troops are doing.
  • 00:25:49
    So this guy, Georg Leopold von Reizzwitz,
  • 00:25:52
    popularly considered the father of modern wargaming,
  • 00:25:55
    begins working on a design that his son eventually finishes
  • 00:25:58
    and calls "Kriegsspiel,"
  • 00:26:00
    the German word for wargame.
  • 00:26:02
    I like to think of this period of history
  • 00:26:03
    as men will invent Warhammer instead of going to therapy.
  • 00:26:07
    So Kriegsspiel is played on accurate topological maps.
  • 00:26:10
    It simulates the fog of war.
  • 00:26:12
    It even invented something like a dungeon master.
  • 00:26:15
    Games of Kriegsspiel would wheel out
  • 00:26:17
    some ancient Prussian general who'd seen some ****,
  • 00:26:20
    I imagine he'd have like one eye,
  • 00:26:22
    and when you declared your orders,
  • 00:26:23
    you'd tell them to him
  • 00:26:24
    and he would tell you what you could expect to happen next
  • 00:26:28
    or whether it was just dumb.
  • 00:26:29
    And thoroughly impressed
  • 00:26:31
    with the military applications of this design,
  • 00:26:33
    King Frederick William III had it instated
  • 00:26:36
    as a training tool in the Prussian military.
  • 00:26:39
    (comical music)
  • 00:26:39
    So how does this get us to Tifa?
  • 00:26:41
    (dramatic music)
  • 00:26:43
    No problem.
  • 00:26:44
    In 1870, when Prussia defeats France, many countries,
  • 00:26:48
    including the United Kingdom and the United States,
  • 00:26:50
    take an interest in Kriegsspiel;
  • 00:26:52
    they begin studying it.
  • 00:26:53
    And by the time we get to World War II,
  • 00:26:55
    wargaming has grown as a tool
  • 00:26:57
    and has mass applications all throughout the war.
  • 00:27:00
    But also this creates companies
  • 00:27:03
    and players of hobbyist wargames
  • 00:27:05
    who continue simulating war after World War II.
  • 00:27:09
    20 years later, in 1971,
  • 00:27:12
    two members of this hobbyist wargaming community,
  • 00:27:14
    Jeff Perren and one Gary Gygax,
  • 00:27:17
    make a game called Chainmail,
  • 00:27:19
    which is simulating mediaeval miniatures combat.
  • 00:27:22
    Then the Chainmail community begins experimenting
  • 00:27:24
    with rules for castle sieges
  • 00:27:26
    that involve sending a team of soldiers
  • 00:27:28
    to try and unlock the front door
  • 00:27:29
    by going in via a dungeon,
  • 00:27:32
    which people realise is fun.
  • 00:27:33
    And eventually this dungeon mini game
  • 00:27:35
    grows into Dungeons & Dragons.
  • 00:27:38
    Incidentally, why do you think Dungeons & Dragons
  • 00:27:40
    is all about tactics and killing ****?
  • 00:27:43
    Why do you think a sequence
  • 00:27:44
    of Dungeons & Dragons games is called a campaign?
  • 00:27:48
    If you know what you're looking for,
  • 00:27:49
    the wargaming ancestry of DnD
  • 00:27:51
    is as visible as a giant tribal tattoo.
  • 00:27:54
    But after the invention of DnD,
  • 00:27:55
    a whole bunch of video games are inspired by it
  • 00:27:57
    and begin riffing on it and then riffing on each other.
  • 00:27:59
    This is how we get the first Final Fantasy game,
  • 00:28:02
    which is why in Final Fantasy 1,
  • 00:28:05
    all of the enemies come from DnD,
  • 00:28:07
    including mimics and illithids.
  • 00:28:10
    And, obviously, if there's no Final Fantasy I,
  • 00:28:12
    there's no Final Fantasy VII with beautiful Tifa
  • 00:28:17
    and her lovely, vacant face.
  • 00:28:19
    (dramatic music)
  • 00:28:22
    One thing I find cute
  • 00:28:22
    is that it's not just that the birth of the RPG
  • 00:28:25
    is a direct result of military innovations,
  • 00:28:28
    but hundreds of years ago,
  • 00:28:29
    Prussians were getting in the same sort of fights
  • 00:28:31
    about the editions of their game as today's DnD
  • 00:28:34
    and Warhammer fans.
  • 00:28:35
    In 1873, Lieutenant Wilhelm Jacob Meckel
  • 00:28:39
    published a treatise
  • 00:28:41
    saying the current edition of Kriegsspiel
  • 00:28:43
    was too complicated
  • 00:28:44
    and the game was better when it was simpler.
  • 00:28:46
    And then there was a new edition
  • 00:28:47
    that took into account his concerns
  • 00:28:48
    and gave more freedom to the GM.
  • 00:28:50
    And lots of people preferred it, but not everybody.
  • 00:28:52
    But more generally,
  • 00:28:54
    if we're talking about the kind of influence
  • 00:28:55
    the military has on video games and vice versa,
  • 00:28:58
    there is obviously the subject
  • 00:29:00
    that could make for a whole separate video
  • 00:29:02
    about the kind of stories that we tell as a society.
  • 00:29:05
    I don't wanna alarm you,
  • 00:29:07
    but this is sort of sociology 101.
  • 00:29:08
    For people living in any society, there is this jingoistic,
  • 00:29:12
    self-aggrandizing oxygen that we all breathe
  • 00:29:15
    that forms our national identity.
  • 00:29:18
    And for me in my country, video games,
  • 00:29:20
    along with TV and movies,
  • 00:29:21
    are part of that system.
  • 00:29:23
    They teach me that I am part of a good
  • 00:29:25
    and noble country that only goes overseas
  • 00:29:27
    and kills people when other countries deserve it,
  • 00:29:30
    or when we're stopping fascism, maybe.
  • 00:29:33
    We all grow up on a diet of news stories,
  • 00:29:35
    and just stories in general,
  • 00:29:37
    where military hardware or tactics are shiny and exciting,
  • 00:29:41
    unless it's deployed against us,
  • 00:29:42
    at which point it's to be judged harshly
  • 00:29:44
    as frightening and indiscriminate.
  • 00:29:46
    Now, I'm not saying that video game designers
  • 00:29:48
    are choosing to make propaganda.
  • 00:29:50
    I am saying that our society, as with every society,
  • 00:29:53
    is so saturated with certain ways of thinking
  • 00:29:55
    that we don't even notice we're doing it,
  • 00:29:57
    but nonetheless, we are reinforcing it.
  • 00:30:00
    This is the loop that sees Call of Duty games
  • 00:30:03
    being popular for letting us live out a fantasy
  • 00:30:05
    that our society imbues us with, of being a soldier,
  • 00:30:09
    where we can't help but learn
  • 00:30:10
    about our country's weaponry and strategies and heroism,
  • 00:30:14
    which is all displayed in exquisite detail,
  • 00:30:16
    and how now, certainly in the UK and America,
  • 00:30:19
    we're getting recruitment adverts for the armed forces
  • 00:30:22
    that make service look like a video game.
  • 00:30:25
    Helpfully, in terms of illustrating this point,
  • 00:30:27
    while I was writing this script,
  • 00:30:28
    "Ukrainian Fight Drone Simulator"
  • 00:30:31
    was just listed on Steam,
  • 00:30:33
    a game looking to let us experience
  • 00:30:34
    living out the POV footage you see
  • 00:30:37
    from real-life Ukrainian drone pilots.
  • 00:30:39
    But for me, the ugliest example of this
  • 00:30:42
    has always been the gunship levels
  • 00:30:45
    that started appearing in Call of Duty games
  • 00:30:47
    round about 2007,
  • 00:30:48
    where in seeking to replicate the distant,
  • 00:30:51
    fuzzy cameras on real-life gunships
  • 00:30:53
    just ended up indistinguishable
  • 00:30:55
    from footage coming out of the Second Gulf War.
  • 00:30:57
    The first time I played one of these, I felt sick.
  • 00:31:00
    I still feel sick watching them back.
  • 00:31:02
    But let's stay on topic.
  • 00:31:04
    Perhaps the most self-deprecating argument
  • 00:31:07
    that the games industry should be paying attention
  • 00:31:09
    to the resurgence of wargames is that People Make Games,
  • 00:31:12
    a gaming YouTube channel,
  • 00:31:15
    were given access to a UK government R&D facility,
  • 00:31:19
    where more than a dozen people
  • 00:31:21
    were kept from doing their day job.
  • 00:31:23
    They had to clear their office of sensitive documents
  • 00:31:26
    before we arrived.
  • 00:31:26
    They had to sit and answer our questions
  • 00:31:28
    and show us their games.
  • 00:31:31
    Why would they do that?
  • 00:31:32
    It is surely because His Majesty's government
  • 00:31:35
    wants DSTL's wargaming arm to look good
  • 00:31:39
    in front of People Make Games' audience
  • 00:31:42
    of gamers for reasons of public relations and recruitment,
  • 00:31:47
    because this global push, arguably a race now,
  • 00:31:50
    to design more wargames and better wargames
  • 00:31:54
    has to involve bringing in more people
  • 00:31:56
    with the right skills,
  • 00:31:58
    with expertise in working in video games,
  • 00:32:00
    in board games, even LARP.
  • 00:32:03
    And the people who were giving us answers in our interviews,
  • 00:32:05
    you could tell they were trying to make working here
  • 00:32:08
    feel like a great idea.
  • 00:32:10
    I spoke to one woman who got hired from the LARP community
  • 00:32:13
    who talked about the importance of immersion
  • 00:32:15
    in government wargames.
  • 00:32:16
    She said it helped players interact emotionally
  • 00:32:18
    with decisions they were making
  • 00:32:20
    when they felt something real was at stake.
  • 00:32:23
    Forgive me for a wonky segue,
  • 00:32:26
    but it sounds like you've got a really fun job
  • 00:32:28
    of people shooting, of, like, you know,
  • 00:32:29
    organising things for people
  • 00:32:31
    shooting zombies running around a warehouse.
  • 00:32:33
    - Yeah. - You have now swapped that
  • 00:32:34
    for the kind of,
  • 00:32:36
    the bleaker end of the spectrum
  • 00:32:37
    of people running around
  • 00:32:38
    and shooting weapons at each other.
  • 00:32:40
    Was that something you wanted to do?
  • 00:32:43
    - Oh, it's an interesting question.
  • 00:32:44
    So there is an overlap of interest there
  • 00:32:46
    because it's all gaming, you know?
  • 00:32:49
    This has a lot more meaning behind it.
  • 00:32:52
    So that is fun, that was fun;
  • 00:32:55
    this is engagement and meaning.
  • 00:32:57
    This actually changes stuff
  • 00:32:59
    for the world and for other people,
  • 00:33:01
    whereas yeah, like, gaming,
  • 00:33:03
    it does change stuff for people in a lot of ways,
  • 00:33:05
    particularly in the way they can develop
  • 00:33:07
    their personal sort of characteristics and skills,
  • 00:33:10
    those sorts of things,
  • 00:33:11
    but this has, like, wider effect.
  • 00:33:14
    - And not only does the wargaming sector
  • 00:33:15
    see the benefit in a whole spread of gaming expertise,
  • 00:33:19
    the same push towards diversity
  • 00:33:21
    that we are seeing in our games industry
  • 00:33:23
    is being completely replicated in theirs.
  • 00:33:27
    - Gaming and wargaming's very often been seen
  • 00:33:29
    as the domain of middle aged white men,
  • 00:33:30
    and that's something we're trying
  • 00:33:31
    to move away from at DSTL.
  • 00:33:33
    We're trying to change the diversity of our teams,
  • 00:33:35
    we're trying to change the diversity
  • 00:33:36
    of the way people think,
  • 00:33:37
    and that's through our recruitment
  • 00:33:39
    and our training and our retention of existing people.
  • 00:33:41
    To your audience,
  • 00:33:42
    I'd like to say if you're sitting there and thinking,
  • 00:33:44
    "I couldn't be a wargame designer
  • 00:33:46
    because of my background and my ethnicity
  • 00:33:48
    and my diversity,"
  • 00:33:49
    ask yourself why and actually get in touch with DSTL
  • 00:33:51
    to find out what we can do to help you.
  • 00:33:53
    - I would encourage you to take a hot second
  • 00:33:56
    before getting in touch with DSTL.
  • 00:33:57
    Maybe just finish this video first.
  • 00:34:00
    Also on the subject of diversity,
  • 00:34:01
    at the Connections Conference,
  • 00:34:02
    I was talking about Gamergate,
  • 00:34:04
    and I had the peculiar experience
  • 00:34:06
    of a major in the British Army in his '60s knowingly nod
  • 00:34:11
    and reach out and palm me
  • 00:34:13
    these two enamel pins,
  • 00:34:16
    a polyhedron in the colours of the pride flag
  • 00:34:18
    and a "stop harassment in gaming" sort of demand,
  • 00:34:21
    which was at once sweet and also a bit meaningless.
  • 00:34:26
    So I guess this is as good a point as any of this video
  • 00:34:29
    to start talking about the ethics of all of this,
  • 00:34:32
    a topic I feel better equipped to handle than most
  • 00:34:35
    and also just in awe of what a frightening subject it is.
  • 00:34:39
    (dramatic music)
  • 00:34:41
    So, like, the well-trodden path to success
  • 00:34:44
    for a YouTube video essayist is to tell you
  • 00:34:47
    exactly how you should feel about something
  • 00:34:49
    so when the video ends,
  • 00:34:50
    you are left with a sense of resolution,
  • 00:34:52
    maybe you even understand exactly who was wrong
  • 00:34:55
    and who was right.
  • 00:34:56
    But morally, I feel that I can't do that;
  • 00:34:59
    it would be ignoring the diversity of backgrounds
  • 00:35:02
    and world views in the PMG audience,
  • 00:35:05
    but also among the PMG team.
  • 00:35:08
    But I do believe that the games industry as a whole
  • 00:35:10
    has an opportunity,
  • 00:35:12
    maybe even arguably a moral obligation
  • 00:35:15
    to learn about this subject
  • 00:35:16
    and begin discussing it.
  • 00:35:18
    Because what's happening right now
  • 00:35:19
    is governments taking innovations
  • 00:35:21
    that we have generated in the service of play
  • 00:35:24
    and then using them to change how they govern.
  • 00:35:27
    We're at the precipice of something right now.
  • 00:35:29
    Our games, our expertise,
  • 00:35:31
    our technology is changing the world, and, yes,
  • 00:35:34
    in some cases,
  • 00:35:35
    directly leading to the deaths of individuals.
  • 00:35:38
    And as I said at the start of this video,
  • 00:35:39
    wargaming has come and gone in the past,
  • 00:35:42
    but this time we have power.
  • 00:35:45
    Today is the first time that wargames have returned
  • 00:35:48
    as theory, as funding buzzword,
  • 00:35:50
    and as praxis, to find games as an industry
  • 00:35:53
    and a global community here waiting for it.
  • 00:35:57
    Culturally, we are now the defining artistic medium
  • 00:36:01
    of a generation.
  • 00:36:02
    And, yeah, RPGs might have been spawned from wargaming
  • 00:36:05
    in an indirect way,
  • 00:36:07
    but right now the big actual play shows
  • 00:36:08
    are playing Madison Square Garden and Wembley Stadium.
  • 00:36:12
    But while I can't tell you exactly what's to be done,
  • 00:36:15
    that's something that you have to decide for yourself,
  • 00:36:17
    I can tell you that doing nothing with this power
  • 00:36:20
    feels pathetic.
  • 00:36:22
    It feels like a dereliction
  • 00:36:24
    of the standards of artistry, of intelligent debate,
  • 00:36:27
    and of care that we hold ourselves to as a community.
  • 00:36:31
    So what I wanna do next in this video
  • 00:36:33
    is just give you, our audience,
  • 00:36:36
    and the larger games industry a starting point
  • 00:36:38
    for these discussions I think we should be having.
  • 00:36:40
    And so let's start with the elephant in the room,
  • 00:36:44
    the big question that I bothered every single one
  • 00:36:47
    of my interviewees about
  • 00:36:48
    and may well have been bubbling away
  • 00:36:49
    in the back of your brain
  • 00:36:50
    since you first clicked on this video, namely:
  • 00:36:53
    Isn't this whole practise totally reprehensible?
  • 00:36:56
    These guys are turning games and play
  • 00:36:59
    into a war fighting tool.
  • 00:37:01
    And, like, yeah,
  • 00:37:04
    that is one way to look at what is happening right now.
  • 00:37:07
    I told you I wasn't gonna tell you
  • 00:37:08
    how to feel in this video,
  • 00:37:09
    but I will offer you a little bit of outrage as a treat.
  • 00:37:13
    For 90% of my time in this sector,
  • 00:37:15
    I was bowled over by how honest and introspective they are.
  • 00:37:19
    You wanna talk about controversies, politics,
  • 00:37:22
    do these games even work?
  • 00:37:23
    Wargaming professionals will yes-and your criticism
  • 00:37:27
    by pointing out other problems
  • 00:37:28
    that you hadn't even considered.
  • 00:37:29
    Jesus, day one of the conference,
  • 00:37:31
    I participated in a mega game
  • 00:37:33
    that was like this big icebreaker
  • 00:37:35
    that simulated the wargaming industry in miniature.
  • 00:37:38
    So some people were on teams
  • 00:37:40
    role-playing like the air force,
  • 00:37:41
    some people were role-playing the university
  • 00:37:44
    designing games for them.
  • 00:37:45
    And it played like a knowing satire
  • 00:37:48
    of everything that was wrong
  • 00:37:49
    with how wargames are commissioned and used.
  • 00:37:52
    It was all about wargame designers
  • 00:37:53
    struggling to make ends meet
  • 00:37:55
    and the militaries getting crap games that didn't work.
  • 00:37:58
    But I said that was 90% of my time in the sector, right?
  • 00:38:01
    That remaining 10%, hmm, repeatedly,
  • 00:38:04
    I kept catching sight of this single dark cog
  • 00:38:07
    at the bottom of this industry
  • 00:38:08
    that keeps the whole machine turning.
  • 00:38:10
    And I'm sure this is something in common
  • 00:38:12
    with people who do PR for the military proper.
  • 00:38:15
    So I would test the water with these folks
  • 00:38:17
    by asking them outright:
  • 00:38:19
    "So, are you designing games that kill people?"
  • 00:38:22
    And the line they use is, "No, you've got it wrong.
  • 00:38:25
    These games save lives."
  • 00:38:27
    That's the canned line I kept hearing.
  • 00:38:29
    And you'd go, "Okay, well whose lives are we saving?"
  • 00:38:32
    And they'd say, "Well, our servicemen and our civilians."
  • 00:38:35
    "But these games are helping us
  • 00:38:36
    to kill our adversaries, right?"
  • 00:38:38
    And then they'd say, "Well yes,
  • 00:38:40
    some of them will do that."
  • 00:38:41
    And it made me feel crazy.
  • 00:38:43
    It's pure doublespeak that shows you
  • 00:38:45
    the grim mathematics that this sector has to do to survive.
  • 00:38:48
    Now, I do genuinely believe that all these same people
  • 00:38:51
    I was interviewing understood the horror of war
  • 00:38:54
    better than most,
  • 00:38:54
    probably better than me
  • 00:38:55
    or you watching this video.
  • 00:38:57
    One of my interviewees had lost a limb
  • 00:38:59
    as a result of injuries sustained in military service.
  • 00:39:03
    But still,
  • 00:39:05
    I did not enjoy my time visiting
  • 00:39:07
    under the stuffy quilt of nationalism
  • 00:39:10
    that has to cover the people that do this job
  • 00:39:13
    that the system requires them to do.
  • 00:39:15
    I found it philosophically suffocating,
  • 00:39:17
    because when you talk about the British military
  • 00:39:19
    exclusively in terms of defence,
  • 00:39:21
    you immediately remove from the conversation,
  • 00:39:24
    they just vanish,
  • 00:39:25
    all the wars in British history
  • 00:39:27
    that are now considered morally cataclysmic.
  • 00:39:30
    Who are we to hide
  • 00:39:31
    behind the gleaming euphemism of defence
  • 00:39:36
    when our overseas adventurism studs our history,
  • 00:39:40
    from our historic colonialism
  • 00:39:41
    to our most recent invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan,
  • 00:39:45
    not to be confused with our previous invasions
  • 00:39:47
    of Iraq and Afghanistan,
  • 00:39:49
    from our role in the creation of Israel,
  • 00:39:51
    through to arming it today?
  • 00:39:53
    Now, credit where it's due.
  • 00:39:55
    When I spoke to the youngest wargame designers
  • 00:39:58
    in the sector,
  • 00:39:58
    the people who most fervently believe
  • 00:40:00
    that wargaming has applications outside of war,
  • 00:40:02
    and I'll be talking about their arguments in a little bit,
  • 00:40:04
    they told me I wasn't crazy.
  • 00:40:06
    And when I asked them, "Are these games weapons?
  • 00:40:09
    They said, "Well, some of them, yeah."
  • 00:40:12
    Also, some of the older wargaming designers gave me answers
  • 00:40:14
    that I felt were philosophically really quite honest.
  • 00:40:18
    Feels to me like assisting the armed forces
  • 00:40:21
    to save lives in conflicts
  • 00:40:23
    would potentially result in more deaths
  • 00:40:26
    on the other side.
  • 00:40:27
    - Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
  • 00:40:28
    That's-
  • 00:40:29
    - [Quinns] It that a plausible conclusion?
  • 00:40:30
    - It's more than plausible.
  • 00:40:31
    It's absolutely correct
  • 00:40:32
    because warfare is obviously adversarial.
  • 00:40:35
    To reduce the lives on our side,
  • 00:40:36
    you are potentially gonna be killing
  • 00:40:37
    more people on the other side.
  • 00:40:39
    I don't dispute that at all.
  • 00:40:40
    The thing that wargaming brings to the party is, firstly,
  • 00:40:43
    conflict prevention.
  • 00:40:44
    We should have wargamed, for example,
  • 00:40:46
    are we successfully deterring Putin?
  • 00:40:48
    We should have wargamed, before the conflict started,
  • 00:40:52
    what we might do in response.
  • 00:40:53
    And doing all these things in advance,
  • 00:40:55
    so giving ourselves the foresight
  • 00:40:58
    as to what's coming down the pike,
  • 00:41:00
    just means that you can react in a better way.
  • 00:41:02
    And in a better way does not mean killing more Russians,
  • 00:41:05
    it means preventing the war from the get go
  • 00:41:07
    or taking steps which have been pre-considered
  • 00:41:10
    to reduce the conflict right the way through.
  • 00:41:13
    - But for every few answers I was given
  • 00:41:16
    that felt grim but practical and honest,
  • 00:41:21
    I would get an answer that felt jingoistic
  • 00:41:24
    and my trust of the scene would be undermined again.
  • 00:41:27
    What would you say to the members of our audience
  • 00:41:29
    who feel that wargaming is taking,
  • 00:41:33
    you know, like,
  • 00:41:34
    game design and then turning it into a weapon of some kind?
  • 00:41:37
    - Yeah, and I can understand that point of view.
  • 00:41:39
    I mean, I'll also state that I'm also anti-war too.
  • 00:41:41
    I'm here for defence, the D in in DSTL, really.
  • 00:41:44
    I wanna make sure that we are protecting our nation.
  • 00:41:46
    We have serving personnel, you know,
  • 00:41:48
    in tricky situations at the moment,
  • 00:41:50
    and to use my skills
  • 00:41:50
    and my sort of analytical background to help them,
  • 00:41:54
    inform decisions for the government,
  • 00:41:56
    make the right decision,
  • 00:41:57
    I think that's a real sort of benefit
  • 00:41:59
    to this particular role
  • 00:42:00
    and something I'm really proud of.
  • 00:42:01
    - So, these are,
  • 00:42:02
    people who are designing these games,
  • 00:42:04
    ultimately, like, yeah, it's about defence,
  • 00:42:06
    but these,
  • 00:42:08
    this is game design that could result in real death
  • 00:42:12
    of not necessarily UK citizens,
  • 00:42:14
    but of other people around the world.
  • 00:42:16
    That seems like something that'd be tricky
  • 00:42:18
    for some of the game designers
  • 00:42:19
    that watch People Make Games to, I don't know,
  • 00:42:22
    square their design practise with.
  • 00:42:24
    - Yeah, and of course you're entitled
  • 00:42:24
    to your own personal opinion on that aspect.
  • 00:42:26
    The way I'd argue is, you know,
  • 00:42:27
    if you go to B&Q, B&Q sell hammers.
  • 00:42:30
    B&Q aren't, you know,
  • 00:42:31
    advocating the fact you use a hammer
  • 00:42:32
    to hit someone around the head,
  • 00:42:33
    they're used to hitting nails.
  • 00:42:34
    So it's how you use the particular tools
  • 00:42:36
    and how you use the particular analysis
  • 00:42:37
    I think is the important bit.
  • 00:42:38
    And as long as you can square it away with yourself
  • 00:42:41
    and you are comfortable you're defending
  • 00:42:43
    and assisting and supporting,
  • 00:42:44
    then I think that's fair enough.
  • 00:42:46
    - Yeah?
  • 00:42:47
    But not 30 minutes before that interview was conducted,
  • 00:42:50
    I was being shown software
  • 00:42:51
    that simulated British Challenger tanks
  • 00:42:54
    assaulting a village.
  • 00:42:55
    - And the objective for this game,
  • 00:42:57
    or the task that Blue Force, you know,
  • 00:42:59
    the UK are doing is to clear the enemy out of this town.
  • 00:43:02
    - And Lee's analogy implies you'd have to be a lunatic
  • 00:43:05
    to use a tool such as this to assist in a dark purpose.
  • 00:43:10
    And, like, I just don't think that's true.
  • 00:43:13
    But also, this is a complicated thing to say,
  • 00:43:17
    I want to live in a country that has tanks
  • 00:43:19
    and has software that better helps them to use those tanks.
  • 00:43:23
    Just speaking historically,
  • 00:43:25
    countries that aren't able to defend themselves
  • 00:43:28
    tend to have a really bad time.
  • 00:43:30
    And also the war in Ukraine
  • 00:43:32
    feels to me like a harbinger of worse wars to come
  • 00:43:36
    in the 21st century.
  • 00:43:37
    But I'd just like if when I talk to people
  • 00:43:40
    who are involved in the creation
  • 00:43:41
    and facilitation of wargames and I say,
  • 00:43:43
    "Wow, this feels like a uncomfortable thing
  • 00:43:46
    to design and to play,"
  • 00:43:48
    they're not like, "Why?"
  • 00:43:51
    God, when DSTL was showing us one piece of software
  • 00:43:53
    that showed planes fighting over a country that, of course,
  • 00:43:56
    in the simulation was England,
  • 00:43:57
    when actually software like that
  • 00:43:59
    is infinitely more likely to have practical applications
  • 00:44:01
    elsewhere on the globe, on multiple occasions,
  • 00:44:04
    stood in front of the projector.
  • 00:44:05
    I made a comment to the room like,
  • 00:44:06
    "Ooh, this is chilling," because it was.
  • 00:44:09
    I was seeing a video game,
  • 00:44:11
    functionally a toy,
  • 00:44:13
    and a kind of toy I've dedicated my life to,
  • 00:44:15
    being used to assist in decision making
  • 00:44:16
    regarding the scrambling of jets
  • 00:44:18
    to conduct real-life missions
  • 00:44:20
    like it's ******* "Ender's Game."
  • 00:44:22
    And so I was saying things like, "Oh, this is weird,"
  • 00:44:25
    and what I was fishing for was someone in the room
  • 00:44:27
    to validate my feelings and be like,
  • 00:44:29
    "Yeah, I know, right?"
  • 00:44:31
    but instead I was always met with silence,
  • 00:44:34
    which means everyone in that room
  • 00:44:35
    didn't have an emotional response
  • 00:44:37
    to this disquieting imagery I was looking at
  • 00:44:40
    or they simply didn't feel
  • 00:44:42
    that they could voice those feelings
  • 00:44:44
    in a room with their boss and a journalist and a PR.
  • 00:44:47
    And that just made me feel super weird as the, like,
  • 00:44:51
    advanced representative of the games industry
  • 00:44:54
    in this government laboratory.
  • 00:44:56
    It made me feel weird.
  • 00:44:57
    And I'm not weird, all right?
  • 00:44:59
    I'm sure lots of you will agree with me in the comments
  • 00:45:01
    that there is something so weird
  • 00:45:03
    about seeing the games we play reflected
  • 00:45:05
    in this fun house mirror to include actual war.
  • 00:45:09
    And I'm not saying it's unnatural.
  • 00:45:11
    You know, human beings are apes and play is how apes learn,
  • 00:45:15
    but games and play also have associations
  • 00:45:18
    with the innocence of childhood.
  • 00:45:21
    And also play has this sinister capacity
  • 00:45:24
    to normalise our actions and make them seen mundane.
  • 00:45:27
    And this is on some level, like,
  • 00:45:29
    part of the appeal for the military, right?
  • 00:45:31
    A game is a prophylactic euphemism
  • 00:45:34
    we put in front of an act that might be unappealing.
  • 00:45:36
    We're just playing, right?
  • 00:45:38
    We're just stabbing a sandbag with a bayonet
  • 00:45:40
    until we're not.
  • 00:45:41
    We're just playing a board game
  • 00:45:43
    that sees us making a decision
  • 00:45:44
    of launching a missile to sink a ship
  • 00:45:46
    with thousands of people aboard until we're not.
  • 00:45:50
    I'm reminded of how in the 19th century,
  • 00:45:52
    the British Empire and the Russian Empire
  • 00:45:54
    fought this proxy war for control
  • 00:45:56
    over the countries of Tibet and Afghanistan and Persia.
  • 00:46:00
    And this war came to be known as the Great Game,
  • 00:46:04
    a piece of language that has always really troubled me
  • 00:46:06
    because for the people making the decisions
  • 00:46:09
    and sending people to die
  • 00:46:10
    and deciding the fates of these countries,
  • 00:46:12
    they get to enjoy the sort of, like,
  • 00:46:13
    foxy imagery that they're playing a game,
  • 00:46:16
    when what do those pawns in this analogy represent?
  • 00:46:19
    Those pawns are human beings.
  • 00:46:21
    But so long as we think of all this as a game,
  • 00:46:23
    as pieces on a board,
  • 00:46:25
    we don't need to think about the countless lives
  • 00:46:28
    that we are changing forever.
  • 00:46:29
    And speaking of Russia,
  • 00:46:31
    when People Make Games started researching this story,
  • 00:46:33
    the war in the public consciousness was Ukraine.
  • 00:46:37
    In the UK,
  • 00:46:38
    that's a war that most of the public are pretty united on
  • 00:46:41
    as these things go,
  • 00:46:42
    as it features a smaller country
  • 00:46:43
    attempting to align itself with progressive European values
  • 00:46:47
    standing up to Vladimir Putin, a fascistic dictator,
  • 00:46:50
    colonialist, and, for what it's worth, a world class bigot.
  • 00:46:54
    And so because this is one of the better wars
  • 00:46:56
    that my country has been involved in,
  • 00:46:58
    that lent the wargaming sector
  • 00:47:00
    an extra sheen of desirability, of justification.
  • 00:47:04
    But then, of course,
  • 00:47:05
    Hamas attacked Israel on October 7th of last year.
  • 00:47:08
    And Israel's indiscriminate response
  • 00:47:11
    that at the time of publishing this video
  • 00:47:12
    continues to lead to the deaths and inconceivable suffering
  • 00:47:16
    of the Palestinian population
  • 00:47:17
    has led to global condemnation.
  • 00:47:20
    And almost overnight,
  • 00:47:22
    this video we were working on
  • 00:47:23
    became even more uncomfortable than it already was.
  • 00:47:27
    Now, for the record,
  • 00:47:28
    the people in the wargaming sector
  • 00:47:30
    who I spoke to for this story told me that despite Israel
  • 00:47:33
    very publicly using Western armaments for this conflict,
  • 00:47:36
    they said they didn't think we were assisting Israel
  • 00:47:39
    using any wargames whatsoever.
  • 00:47:41
    However, it's also true that countries
  • 00:47:44
    that are allies regularly conduct wargames
  • 00:47:46
    and military manoeuvres together and share expertise.
  • 00:47:49
    So while I have no way to confirm this,
  • 00:47:52
    it seems possible to me that Israeli military officials
  • 00:47:56
    might have attended events
  • 00:47:57
    where they were able to learn western wargaming methods
  • 00:48:00
    and then take them home to practise
  • 00:48:02
    and refine those wargames themselves.
  • 00:48:05
    All of which is to say,
  • 00:48:07
    and this is backed up throughout history
  • 00:48:09
    when you look at the scientists
  • 00:48:10
    and engineers who create inventions
  • 00:48:12
    with military applications,
  • 00:48:13
    if you were to accept a job in the wargaming sector,
  • 00:48:17
    it might be quite hard to know
  • 00:48:19
    who will end up wielding your designs
  • 00:48:21
    or what they'll be trying to do with them.
  • 00:48:25
    I mean, it's sort of what Lee said, right?
  • 00:48:26
    If you make a hammer, the question is,
  • 00:48:28
    do you feel responsible if a maniac uses it?
  • 00:48:32
    I think where Lee and I differ
  • 00:48:33
    is I just think there might be more maniacs than he does.
  • 00:48:36
    Like, most of the audience for this video
  • 00:48:38
    are gonna be living in the United Kingdom
  • 00:48:40
    or the United States,
  • 00:48:41
    and those are two countries with, let's say,
  • 00:48:44
    very chequered decision making.
  • 00:48:46
    And so it just feels to me that on one level,
  • 00:48:49
    if you are signing up to make wargames for your country,
  • 00:48:51
    you are just crossing your fingers
  • 00:48:53
    that what you make and what it's used for
  • 00:48:55
    does not later become a source of shame.
  • 00:48:58
    That said, it was pointed out to me
  • 00:49:00
    that for lots of wargame designers,
  • 00:49:02
    they have some degree of autonomy over what they make
  • 00:49:05
    and who they work for,
  • 00:49:06
    though even this can be complicated.
  • 00:49:09
    - I was in Rome at a NATO conference
  • 00:49:10
    and I was on my own having dinner.
  • 00:49:12
    And I got talking to somebody at the table next to me
  • 00:49:13
    who was also from Ireland.
  • 00:49:14
    And I thought, "Oh, well, that's a nice coincidence."
  • 00:49:16
    It turned out he was actually Belgian.
  • 00:49:17
    And I said, "What do you do?"
  • 00:49:18
    And he said, "I work in the central bank.
  • 00:49:20
    I'm an economist."
  • 00:49:21
    And he said, "What do you do?"
  • 00:49:22
    And I explained what I was doing there.
  • 00:49:23
    And then he kind of lectured me about, you know,
  • 00:49:24
    how do I sleep at night working with NATO and, you know,
  • 00:49:28
    when they're doing all these terrible things and, you know,
  • 00:49:29
    all the violence in Ukraine.
  • 00:49:31
    And I'm like, "Well, NATO's trying to help."
  • 00:49:33
    And he's like, "Well, it's making it worse."
  • 00:49:34
    And I just was like,
  • 00:49:35
    "Oh, I think I'm the bad guy in this conversation
  • 00:49:38
    with a central banker."
  • 00:49:41
    And it's kind of stuck with me.
  • 00:49:42
    And I haven't quite got the answer to it.
  • 00:49:44
    I think one of the things I tell myself
  • 00:49:46
    is this is being done;
  • 00:49:48
    whether I study it or not, it's being done.
  • 00:49:51
    And it would be useful to know how it actually works.
  • 00:49:53
    I suspect that most wargames
  • 00:49:55
    are creating some form of distorted knowledge
  • 00:49:57
    or distorted training,
  • 00:49:59
    negative learning of some kind very often.
  • 00:50:02
    It'd be useful to understand that better
  • 00:50:03
    so that we do it less.
  • 00:50:05
    But the downside is that, you know,
  • 00:50:07
    when I say this, I say to my students,
  • 00:50:08
    "Oh, you know, you have to study civil wars
  • 00:50:09
    because then you can understand how to prevent them."
  • 00:50:11
    The difference with something like wargaming
  • 00:50:12
    is you're actually studying a tool.
  • 00:50:14
    So as you understand how to refine it more,
  • 00:50:16
    there's every possibility that people you don't like
  • 00:50:18
    would start using that refined tool.
  • 00:50:19
    - [Quinns] This relates to my last question,
  • 00:50:21
    which is, I mean, just,
  • 00:50:22
    is this discipline taking commercial game design
  • 00:50:24
    and turning it into weapons?
  • 00:50:28
    - Is it turning it into weapons?
  • 00:50:29
    I'm not sure it's turning it into weapons.
  • 00:50:31
    I think it can influence actual decisions
  • 00:50:35
    around military war fighting things,
  • 00:50:39
    including weapons procurement.
  • 00:50:41
    So it's used sometimes to test weapons.
  • 00:50:43
    I don't think it is a weapon itself, right,
  • 00:50:45
    because I think we'd have to be clear
  • 00:50:46
    about how are you hurting somebody directly with a wargame.
  • 00:50:48
    But indirectly, is this harming people?
  • 00:50:50
    At least sometimes, yes, definitely.
  • 00:50:52
    So then it's, "Well, how do you sleep with yourself?"
  • 00:50:55
    And I don't know.
  • 00:50:56
    I mean, it's,
  • 00:51:00
    right now, at this moment in history,
  • 00:51:03
    I'm more confident than I was
  • 00:51:05
    maybe even 10 years ago about, you know,
  • 00:51:07
    if we have to pick sides,
  • 00:51:08
    I'm a little bit more comfortable picking one
  • 00:51:10
    than I used to be.
  • 00:51:11
    You know, I just had a baby daughter now.
  • 00:51:12
    And I don't think everywhere in the world is the exact same
  • 00:51:14
    and I don't think any country is interchangeable
  • 00:51:16
    with any other country in order to just be the same.
  • 00:51:18
    I think we're radically different.
  • 00:51:19
    You know, it's like there are sides to some degree.
  • 00:51:21
    I just never thought I'd be in a position
  • 00:51:22
    where I actually have to kind of come down
  • 00:51:24
    off the fence and,
  • 00:51:27
    but there you are.
  • 00:51:28
    - Lots to think about.
  • 00:51:29
    But let's just hit the reset button
  • 00:51:32
    on this philosophical discussion real quick
  • 00:51:34
    so I can reframe it by using my ruler from hell.
  • 00:51:38
    This is a promotional tchotchke given to me at Connections
  • 00:51:40
    by a gentleman promoting his company MINES:
  • 00:51:43
    Mission Impacts of Nuclear Events Software.
  • 00:51:46
    And it is a pocket size reference
  • 00:51:48
    for what would keep you safe from different sizes
  • 00:51:51
    of a nuclear blast
  • 00:51:52
    as well as what injuries you'll sustain
  • 00:51:54
    such as burns to the retina of your eyeball.
  • 00:51:58
    It's also a ruler.
  • 00:52:00
    But when the man gave me this ruler,
  • 00:52:01
    he explained the pitch for his company,
  • 00:52:03
    which is that traditionally in military wargames,
  • 00:52:05
    the moment someone decides to launch a nuclear weapon,
  • 00:52:08
    the game is over.
  • 00:52:09
    - [Automated Voice] The only winning move is not to play.
  • 00:52:12
    - Because the consequences are too cataclysmic
  • 00:52:15
    and far reaching to hope to simulate.
  • 00:52:17
    And also it doesn't matter, you've all lost.
  • 00:52:19
    And the gentleman who gave me this pointed out
  • 00:52:21
    that this means none of our militaries
  • 00:52:22
    are practising for what happens
  • 00:52:24
    if someone uses a tactical nuclear weapon, a small one,
  • 00:52:27
    the kind of thing that could flatten a town
  • 00:52:29
    or just a building,
  • 00:52:31
    and which there was a lot of fear
  • 00:52:32
    about Russia using in Ukraine.
  • 00:52:35
    And the gentleman who gave me this ruler pointed out
  • 00:52:36
    that this surely makes the world a more dangerous place
  • 00:52:39
    if our decision makers aren't training for the possibility
  • 00:52:42
    of a small nuclear attack.
  • 00:52:45
    But the counter argument would go,
  • 00:52:47
    "Okay, if everyone around the world is playing games
  • 00:52:49
    where using tiny nuclear bombs is an option,
  • 00:52:52
    aren't we all that much more likely
  • 00:52:54
    to reach for that in real life?"
  • 00:52:56
    To which my answer is,
  • 00:53:00
    "I don't know."
  • 00:53:01
    So all of that makes this a complicated story
  • 00:53:04
    for People Make Games to be covering, right?
  • 00:53:07
    No.
  • 00:53:08
    Not yet, it's not.
  • 00:53:09
    Allow me to significantly complicate this story
  • 00:53:12
    by presenting the ethical case for wargames.
  • 00:53:16
    (mellow music)
  • 00:53:18
    So there's this joke in the wargaming community
  • 00:53:20
    that on his deathbed, the inventor of wargames,
  • 00:53:23
    Georg Leopold von Reizzwitz,
  • 00:53:24
    turned to his wife and his dying words were,
  • 00:53:26
    "I wish I'd come up with a better name."
  • 00:53:28
    And the reason for that
  • 00:53:30
    is that everyone in this sector agrees
  • 00:53:32
    that if it is true you can use games to practise, plan,
  • 00:53:35
    and preempt a war,
  • 00:53:37
    you can use games to practise, plan,
  • 00:53:38
    and preempt any other problem.
  • 00:53:41
    - It probably shouldn't be called a wargame.
  • 00:53:42
    It should be called a serious game
  • 00:53:44
    'cause it is used by humanitarians, by NGOs.
  • 00:53:47
    It is just a technique,
  • 00:53:49
    but it can save lives, money, time, resource,
  • 00:53:53
    and things like the climate.
  • 00:53:55
    - To which the cynical response would be,
  • 00:53:56
    "Hang on, Quinns.
  • 00:53:57
    You've said that the sector
  • 00:53:58
    gets almost all of its funding from the military
  • 00:54:01
    in one way or another.
  • 00:54:02
    Surely this is just a way of the sector washing its hands
  • 00:54:04
    and making it seem cleaner and more appealing."
  • 00:54:07
    And that is absolutely correct.
  • 00:54:09
    The wargaming sector loves wheeling out this argument
  • 00:54:11
    because it makes it seem more moral, more noble.
  • 00:54:15
    But also it wheels out this argument
  • 00:54:17
    because I think it's true.
  • 00:54:20
    Like the American government,
  • 00:54:21
    wargaming to explore vulnerabilities
  • 00:54:23
    in election infrastructure
  • 00:54:25
    that President Trump might have tried to exploit
  • 00:54:27
    back in 2020.
  • 00:54:29
    - I did work, as well, out in South Africa.
  • 00:54:31
    I spent six months out there during COVID
  • 00:54:33
    looking at water strategies for drought.
  • 00:54:37
    Wargaming is something
  • 00:54:38
    that can be used for professional development,
  • 00:54:40
    for capability and force development
  • 00:54:41
    if you're talking about the military,
  • 00:54:42
    if you're talking outside of the military.
  • 00:54:44
    It's got real utility.
  • 00:54:46
    You know, first of all, red teaming organisations,
  • 00:54:48
    crisis response plans, crisis management plans,
  • 00:54:51
    security plans, business continuity and resilience plans,
  • 00:54:54
    even in planning to deliver business opportunity,
  • 00:54:58
    it may be a big construction project or something like it,
  • 00:55:00
    where I've seen real disasters in the past
  • 00:55:02
    because they haven't put the time and the effort
  • 00:55:04
    into the planning process.
  • 00:55:05
    And then stress testing those plans.
  • 00:55:06
    Just a couple of weeks ago,
  • 00:55:07
    I was invited to present on how we do military planning
  • 00:55:11
    and stress testing of plans at a global supply chain
  • 00:55:13
    and logistics conference
  • 00:55:14
    at the University of Southern California.
  • 00:55:16
    Big organisations being represented there
  • 00:55:20
    really interested in how we apply these processes, you know,
  • 00:55:24
    a little bit of the rigour
  • 00:55:25
    that military planning brings
  • 00:55:26
    and the experience that comes with it,
  • 00:55:28
    but then how you go
  • 00:55:29
    about actually stress testing those plans.
  • 00:55:31
    And wargaming is one method of doing that.
  • 00:55:33
    You may wanna call it decision gaming
  • 00:55:34
    or crisis and risk gaming.
  • 00:55:36
    It all looks remarkably similar.
  • 00:55:38
    - Two of the wargame designers I spoke to at Connections
  • 00:55:41
    had the Red Cross
  • 00:55:42
    and Britain's National Health Services as clients,
  • 00:55:44
    two entities that were able to look at games
  • 00:55:46
    designed for armies to practise their logistics
  • 00:55:48
    and they said,
  • 00:55:49
    "Hey, that would be exactly as useful for us."
  • 00:55:53
    So from this perspective,
  • 00:55:54
    wargaming is just the latest invention
  • 00:55:56
    on a long list of stuff invented
  • 00:55:59
    due to deep military funding
  • 00:56:00
    that has since found wider application in society,
  • 00:56:04
    a star-studded list that includes, you love it,
  • 00:56:07
    the internet, GPS, canned food, cargo pants.
  • 00:56:11
    And you know what else?
  • 00:56:11
    Some of the first disposable menstrual products,
  • 00:56:15
    which were popularised in the 1920s
  • 00:56:16
    after British and American nurses
  • 00:56:18
    began using their militaries' new high-tech bandages
  • 00:56:21
    when they were on their period.
  • 00:56:23
    Which is just like, women have been bleeding
  • 00:56:25
    since the dawn of time
  • 00:56:26
    and then World War I happens
  • 00:56:27
    and the patriarchy is like,
  • 00:56:28
    "Something must be done for our boys."
  • 00:56:31
    And so when you're talking about the ethics
  • 00:56:33
    of whether you should dedicate your professional career
  • 00:56:35
    to developing wargames,
  • 00:56:37
    we do also have to have, as part of that discussion,
  • 00:56:40
    whether it's ethical to refuse
  • 00:56:42
    to develop something that is in its infancy
  • 00:56:45
    but has the potential to help all of humanity.
  • 00:56:47
    - I've been working in government
  • 00:56:49
    for the last five to seven years
  • 00:56:50
    to help bring in a bit more wargaming
  • 00:56:52
    and reasonable challenge into government.
  • 00:56:54
    - [Quinns] Okay. What does that mean?
  • 00:56:57
    - So wargaming is an interesting concept
  • 00:56:58
    because it means a lot of different things
  • 00:56:59
    to a lot of different people.
  • 00:57:00
    But actually,
  • 00:57:01
    the kind of core kind of concept
  • 00:57:03
    of how do we allow a group of people
  • 00:57:06
    who are trying to deliver public services
  • 00:57:08
    to think through problems,
  • 00:57:09
    come at it from different approaches,
  • 00:57:11
    and say the things that are slightly uncomfortable to say
  • 00:57:14
    and to kind of raise those risks that, you know,
  • 00:57:17
    otherwise you don't want to really think about,
  • 00:57:19
    and to think through what happens next.
  • 00:57:21
    How we think about delivering healthcare,
  • 00:57:23
    how we think about delivering agricultural policy,
  • 00:57:25
    how we think about delivering crisis response,
  • 00:57:27
    all of these areas require us to make the right decisions.
  • 00:57:30
    We are always looking for more people
  • 00:57:31
    who want to move tiny hospitals around the board
  • 00:57:33
    and not the tiny tanks.
  • 00:57:35
    And it is really vital
  • 00:57:36
    that actually the ability to challenge each other
  • 00:57:39
    isn't just something that soldiers do,
  • 00:57:41
    that we do a little bit more on the civilian side as well.
  • 00:57:43
    So that's why I kind of try and do
  • 00:57:45
    a little bit of my part to make that happen.
  • 00:57:47
    - I found my conversation with Alex inspiring.
  • 00:57:49
    If militaries have realised that using wargames,
  • 00:57:52
    they can make better decisions,
  • 00:57:53
    they can explore the consequences of their actions,
  • 00:57:56
    and they can be better equipped
  • 00:57:57
    to question the assumptions of their superiors,
  • 00:57:59
    doesn't that perhaps even mean
  • 00:58:01
    that we as gamers have something like a moral obligation
  • 00:58:05
    for there to be more wargames in our society,
  • 00:58:08
    for us to assist in this grand transference
  • 00:58:11
    of all the skills and design out of the military
  • 00:58:14
    and into wider society?
  • 00:58:16
    Well, maybe not,
  • 00:58:18
    because allow me to complicate this story
  • 00:58:20
    just one more time by asking you:
  • 00:58:24
    Does wargaming,
  • 00:58:25
    this thing that your tax dollars
  • 00:58:27
    are being spent on right now,
  • 00:58:28
    actually work at all?
  • 00:58:30
    (suspenseful music)
  • 00:58:33
    So, practitioners of wargames agree
  • 00:58:35
    that the right game at the right time
  • 00:58:36
    can help humans to make better decisions.
  • 00:58:39
    They also agree that the wrong game at the wrong time,
  • 00:58:41
    or one that's just moderated inexpertly,
  • 00:58:44
    or one that's played badly or had bad data put into it,
  • 00:58:47
    or bad subject matter experts
  • 00:58:49
    might make humans think they're better informed
  • 00:58:52
    when, in fact,
  • 00:58:53
    some or all of what they just learned might be wrong.
  • 00:58:58
    This subject was in the news recently
  • 00:59:00
    when "The Washington Post" published a two-part article
  • 00:59:02
    on Ukraine's failed offensive in 2023.
  • 00:59:06
    The articles talked
  • 00:59:07
    about how the offensive played out differently
  • 00:59:09
    to how American wargames predicted
  • 00:59:11
    and included a line from a senior Ukrainian general
  • 00:59:14
    saying that because the war in Ukraine
  • 00:59:16
    is unlike anything the world's seen before,
  • 00:59:18
    with its World War I trenches and skies full of drones,
  • 00:59:21
    wargaming, quote, "doesn't work."
  • 00:59:24
    "All these methods,
  • 00:59:26
    you can take them and throw them away, you know?
  • 00:59:28
    It doesn't work like that now."
  • 00:59:30
    Meaning wargames might not only be a waste of man hours
  • 00:59:33
    and your taxpayer money,
  • 00:59:35
    they might lead decision makers
  • 00:59:37
    to confidently make decisions that are bad.
  • 00:59:40
    But let's imagine that wargame practitioners
  • 00:59:42
    don't fundamentally misunderstand their subject
  • 00:59:45
    in the way that Ukrainian general was talking about.
  • 00:59:48
    Wargaming is a deeply fraught practise.
  • 00:59:52
    For starters, the genre of game and who plays it
  • 00:59:56
    will inform takeaways.
  • 00:59:57
    An international relations scholar who studied wargames
  • 01:00:00
    played about nuclear weapons exchange during the Cold War
  • 01:00:03
    found that the games that presented players
  • 01:00:05
    with basically mathematics and probability,
  • 01:00:07
    as if you're playing "Settlers of Catan" with nukes,
  • 01:00:10
    saw players becoming more likely to launch
  • 01:00:13
    their nuclear weapons,
  • 01:00:14
    while games that involved negotiation
  • 01:00:16
    and talking with other human beings who held nukes
  • 01:00:19
    made players less likely to utilise their nuclear weapons.
  • 01:00:23
    And let's talk about "The Three Witches of Wargaming."
  • 01:00:26
    This is a paper
  • 01:00:27
    by wargame developer Stephen Downes-Martin
  • 01:00:29
    that capably explains
  • 01:00:30
    how basically absolutely everyone involved
  • 01:00:33
    with a wargame can ruin it.
  • 01:00:35
    So it all starts with a sponsor,
  • 01:00:36
    like the United States Navy,
  • 01:00:38
    who has the budget and wants its staff
  • 01:00:39
    to wargame a particular problem.
  • 01:00:41
    Let's pause for a second
  • 01:00:42
    to think about why are they doing that.
  • 01:00:44
    It's probably not because they have no idea what to do,
  • 01:00:48
    they've never thought about this problem before,
  • 01:00:50
    they're panicking.
  • 01:00:51
    No, these people are professionals
  • 01:00:53
    who make decisions like this for a living.
  • 01:00:55
    So it's likely that before the game designer
  • 01:00:56
    has even started work,
  • 01:00:58
    they already have research or experience
  • 01:01:00
    or instinct of how to resolve this problem,
  • 01:01:02
    and they will be happiest
  • 01:01:04
    if the wargame backs up what people in the navy
  • 01:01:07
    are already talking about doing.
  • 01:01:09
    If the wargame then act as this source of evidence
  • 01:01:11
    that goes, "Ooh, no, don't do that.
  • 01:01:13
    That would be terrible.
  • 01:01:14
    That's not your best decision at all,"
  • 01:01:15
    if decision makers in the navy listen to that wargame,
  • 01:01:18
    it makes them look incompetent.
  • 01:01:19
    Or they can say, "Mm, no.
  • 01:01:21
    We think that wargame is pointless, actually."
  • 01:01:23
    But who paid for it?
  • 01:01:24
    The navy did.
  • 01:01:25
    So, again, that makes them look incompetent.
  • 01:01:27
    So from the very beginning,
  • 01:01:28
    this whole quasi-scientific process is probably biassed.
  • 01:01:32
    The second witch of wargaming
  • 01:01:34
    is what's known as the chain of command,
  • 01:01:36
    basically the people directly above the wargame designer
  • 01:01:39
    who's communicating with them and commissioning them.
  • 01:01:42
    This person, sort of your customer,
  • 01:01:44
    might have opinions.
  • 01:01:45
    They might also feel that it will reflect badly on them
  • 01:01:48
    if your game models something in one way or another,
  • 01:01:51
    if it's too complicated or too simple.
  • 01:01:53
    They're thinking about their career.
  • 01:01:54
    And because they're the one paying you,
  • 01:01:56
    if they have feedback,
  • 01:01:57
    it's not like you can say no.
  • 01:01:59
    If you work in any creative field
  • 01:02:01
    and have ever experienced the torture
  • 01:02:03
    of getting feedback from your client,
  • 01:02:05
    you'll understand all this implicitly.
  • 01:02:07
    The third witch of wargaming is the players,
  • 01:02:09
    the people who actually play your game on the day.
  • 01:02:12
    About all the game designers are watching this video
  • 01:02:14
    are nodding like, "Yep, players will **** a game up."
  • 01:02:17
    Ideally, they're competent at the role
  • 01:02:19
    they have to take on during the game.
  • 01:02:20
    And ideally, they focus on simply playing
  • 01:02:23
    rather than trying to show off and look brilliant
  • 01:02:25
    in front of their colleagues.
  • 01:02:27
    But even if you duck these two issues,
  • 01:02:28
    Downes-Martin adds that senior players
  • 01:02:30
    will often try and redesign the game
  • 01:02:33
    as they're playing it.
  • 01:02:34
    Remember how in Kriegsspiel
  • 01:02:35
    the Prussians would wheel out a general
  • 01:02:37
    whose job was to sit there and go,
  • 01:02:39
    "No, that wouldn't work.
  • 01:02:40
    No, don't do it like that"?
  • 01:02:41
    That is such a natural human instinct,
  • 01:02:43
    that people will do it when playing wargames
  • 01:02:45
    even if they're not the games master.
  • 01:02:47
    They don't care about the science,
  • 01:02:49
    they don't care about the larger design of the game,
  • 01:02:51
    they just see one mechanic and go,
  • 01:02:53
    "No, that's not how that works.
  • 01:02:55
    We need to fix it right now."
  • 01:02:57
    All of which makes wargaming
  • 01:02:59
    a pretty fraught craft/science
  • 01:03:02
    to try and draw conclusions from.
  • 01:03:04
    But, hey, we've been doing this
  • 01:03:05
    for hundreds of years, right?
  • 01:03:07
    At least we have hundreds of years of data and failures
  • 01:03:11
    and success stories to draw from.
  • 01:03:13
    (dramatic music)
  • 01:03:14
    No.
  • 01:03:15
    No, we really don't.
  • 01:03:16
    Because unlike when the military designs a bandage
  • 01:03:19
    and the rest of the world is free to look at it
  • 01:03:20
    and realise what they've really designed
  • 01:03:22
    is a menstrual pad,
  • 01:03:23
    wargames suffer from what was described to me
  • 01:03:25
    as the military fetish for secrecy.
  • 01:03:28
    If your country's military loves one thing,
  • 01:03:31
    it's for other militaries
  • 01:03:32
    to have no idea what's going on in there.
  • 01:03:35
    And so practically all wargames
  • 01:03:37
    that have ever been played are designed in secret,
  • 01:03:40
    played in private,
  • 01:03:41
    and then put on a shelf
  • 01:03:42
    in the basement of a storage facility somewhere,
  • 01:03:45
    to never see the light of day again.
  • 01:03:48
    What did you learn from the game?
  • 01:03:49
    What did you learn from running the game?
  • 01:03:51
    What did you learn to never ever do again?
  • 01:03:54
    Hardly anything is published,
  • 01:03:56
    we just don't know.
  • 01:03:58
    - That's the biggest block on the ability for us,
  • 01:04:02
    us being academics or researchers
  • 01:04:04
    or people interested in this,
  • 01:04:05
    to actually be able to really assess
  • 01:04:07
    and evaluate how wargaming could or should work better
  • 01:04:10
    because we cannot get access to the raw material.
  • 01:04:12
    So you might get to read the report.
  • 01:04:14
    So, you know,
  • 01:04:15
    you'll get 150 page report saying,
  • 01:04:16
    "This is the game we ran."
  • 01:04:17
    But even when you get to end that report's, it's like,
  • 01:04:18
    "I still don't really actually know
  • 01:04:20
    what the game looks like.
  • 01:04:21
    I don't have a real sense of, like,
  • 01:04:22
    did you have 50 units or 2000 units?"
  • 01:04:24
    You know, you still are kind of lost a little bit, like,
  • 01:04:26
    "What's the game? I don't know the game."
  • 01:04:28
    And so then you can't really evaluate the results.
  • 01:04:29
    They're like, "And then this is what happened."
  • 01:04:30
    You're like, "Says you."
  • 01:04:31
    Like, you know, it may be completely true,
  • 01:04:33
    but I can't independently verify what you're saying,
  • 01:04:37
    which is kind of rule number one of science, right?
  • 01:04:39
    It has to be transparent.
  • 01:04:40
    I have to, in principle,
  • 01:04:41
    be able to replicate what you did.
  • 01:04:44
    I have to have access to the same...
  • 01:04:45
    You know, you should be giving me your data
  • 01:04:46
    and I should be able to look at it.
  • 01:04:47
    Now, with something like statistics,
  • 01:04:48
    you may kinda find statistics, in general,
  • 01:04:50
    to be kind of disagreeable
  • 01:04:51
    or making a lot of kind of questionable assumptions
  • 01:04:53
    or anything else,
  • 01:04:54
    but it can defend itself, right?
  • 01:04:56
    It can sort of say,
  • 01:04:57
    "It's on this basis that we make knowledge claims.
  • 01:04:59
    These are the assumptions, very strictly,
  • 01:05:00
    that we're making about reality."
  • 01:05:02
    Now, your mileage may vary.
  • 01:05:03
    You might go, "I still don't buy it,"
  • 01:05:04
    which is very often the way I feel about statistics,
  • 01:05:06
    but they can make that claim.
  • 01:05:09
    And I think what wargaming has struggled with always
  • 01:05:11
    is that ability to be able to articulate,
  • 01:05:13
    "You should buy this."
  • 01:05:14
    And I think the key distinction
  • 01:05:15
    is wargamers focus on design
  • 01:05:17
    and assume it's producing knowledge or educational outcomes.
  • 01:05:22
    Academics focus on the way that the existing methods,
  • 01:05:25
    or ways we have of justifying knowledge claims,
  • 01:05:28
    so they're fixated on:
  • 01:05:29
    "Is this, like, rigorous science?"
  • 01:05:32
    And they kind of assume that any game they design
  • 01:05:34
    is good enough to do it,
  • 01:05:35
    if you know what I mean.
  • 01:05:36
    So they're kind of like not great games,
  • 01:05:37
    but great science.
  • 01:05:38
    - Which is how we get to this moment in time
  • 01:05:41
    where we have been wargaming for like 150 years
  • 01:05:44
    and yet the academic book
  • 01:05:46
    on how do humans learn from games
  • 01:05:50
    has as yet, unbelievably,
  • 01:05:53
    still never been written.
  • 01:05:54
    Mind you, that day cannot be too far away now, at least,
  • 01:05:57
    because right now the world
  • 01:05:58
    is seeing the creation of wargaming
  • 01:06:00
    as a field of academic study.
  • 01:06:02
    So those people will be putting something together soon.
  • 01:06:05
    And hopefully the conclusion is,
  • 01:06:06
    "Yeah, humans don't really learn from games
  • 01:06:09
    as much as they think they do."
  • 01:06:10
    And so we come to the end of this video.
  • 01:06:12
    What have we learned?
  • 01:06:13
    Have we learned a lot?
  • 01:06:13
    Have we learned nothing?
  • 01:06:15
    I don't know, man.
  • 01:06:15
    And now I need to try and put a takeaway on this?
  • 01:06:19
    (lively music)
  • 01:06:23
    I guess if I have a note to end on, it's this:
  • 01:06:28
    Don't look away.
  • 01:06:29
    The games industry has a patchy record
  • 01:06:33
    of engaging with political causes.
  • 01:06:36
    There are areas we can be proud of.
  • 01:06:37
    You know, the push towards inclusivity and diversity,
  • 01:06:40
    while it is achingly slow,
  • 01:06:42
    I do see it happening, you know?
  • 01:06:45
    No matter how many bigots we **** off,
  • 01:06:47
    we continue this line that games and play is for everybody.
  • 01:06:49
    Our community's history also glitters
  • 01:06:51
    with wonderful fundraising efforts for great causes.
  • 01:06:54
    And in recent years,
  • 01:06:55
    it's been really nice seeing the games community
  • 01:06:57
    develop an appetite for long video essays
  • 01:07:00
    that cover really complicated issues.
  • 01:07:02
    But equally, as a community,
  • 01:07:05
    we have what I think is a truly pathetic habit
  • 01:07:09
    of letting absolutely lethal problems exist
  • 01:07:13
    and thinking, "Oh, that's not our responsibility,"
  • 01:07:15
    because we don't recognise it as our kind of games.
  • 01:07:19
    Oh, predatory business practises
  • 01:07:21
    and the reinvention of gambling in the mobile sector, yeah,
  • 01:07:24
    we're not gonna talk about that or think about that
  • 01:07:26
    because mobile gamers, yeah,
  • 01:07:27
    they're not our people.
  • 01:07:28
    Or, like, everyone was really supportive
  • 01:07:30
    of when PMG examined the concatenation of horrors
  • 01:07:33
    happening under Roblox Corporation,
  • 01:07:35
    but my question to you is:
  • 01:07:37
    Why did it take the games industry so long
  • 01:07:39
    to notice how bad that situation was?
  • 01:07:41
    And it's because we looked at Roblox and went,
  • 01:07:43
    "Oh, those games are weird and for kids.
  • 01:07:45
    That's not our kind of gaming."
  • 01:07:47
    And now we're seeing the resurgence of wargaming,
  • 01:07:51
    the creepy great uncle of gaming, coming back.
  • 01:07:55
    And he wants to do his thing again, but bigger than ever.
  • 01:07:58
    And he sees us, his nephew, in this analogy,
  • 01:08:01
    and he wants to reach into our pockets
  • 01:08:03
    and take a bit of our, a bit of our expertise,
  • 01:08:06
    bit of our technology, bit of our design,
  • 01:08:08
    bit of our spirit.
  • 01:08:09
    And I'm sat here wondering,
  • 01:08:11
    "What's it gonna be this time, gamers?
  • 01:08:14
    Hmm?"
  • 01:08:15
    Are we once again gonna claim
  • 01:08:16
    that this is not our problem?
  • 01:08:18
    Because lemme tell you,
  • 01:08:20
    it's not just that we have power
  • 01:08:22
    to influence or keep tabs on this sector.
  • 01:08:26
    We're the only people with power.
  • 01:08:28
    No one else understands games.
  • 01:08:30
    And so I'm just asking us to, like,
  • 01:08:32
    think and discuss among ourselves
  • 01:08:36
    what our opportunities are
  • 01:08:37
    and perhaps even what our responsibility is.
  • 01:08:40
    I'm just pulling this out my arse now,
  • 01:08:42
    but I'm talking about maybe game unions
  • 01:08:45
    having clauses in their contracts
  • 01:08:46
    so their work isn't used for military applications.
  • 01:08:50
    I'm talking about the now well-established field
  • 01:08:51
    of game academics entering conversation
  • 01:08:54
    with the brand new field of wargaming academics
  • 01:08:57
    to see what we can learn from each other.
  • 01:08:59
    I'm talking about whatever civic wargaming we do,
  • 01:09:02
    it actually works.
  • 01:09:04
    And I suppose in an ideal world,
  • 01:09:06
    I'm talking about those young wargame designers
  • 01:09:09
    who I met who understand that, yes,
  • 01:09:11
    this sector sprung from the haunted womb of the military,
  • 01:09:14
    but that it really can make the world a better place.
  • 01:09:17
    I would love for them to feel that they have the resources
  • 01:09:20
    of the games industry behind them
  • 01:09:21
    when it comes to demilitarising the sector.
  • 01:09:24
    Honestly, I don't really know
  • 01:09:27
    exactly what we can do.
  • 01:09:30
    I just know I feel really uncomfortable
  • 01:09:33
    about what I think is gonna happen
  • 01:09:36
    over the next 10, 20, 30 years.
  • 01:09:40
    I think mostly, as an industry,
  • 01:09:43
    we're gonna ignore that this is happening,
  • 01:09:45
    just like when Unity was revealed
  • 01:09:46
    to have signed military contracts, we all went, "Whoa,"
  • 01:09:50
    and then went back to whatever we were doing.
  • 01:09:51
    I think in the years to come,
  • 01:09:53
    our sector is gonna continue
  • 01:09:54
    occasionally glancing over at what's happening
  • 01:09:57
    in wargaming with the disinterest of a glutted animal.
  • 01:10:01
    And I think by, like, 2040,
  • 01:10:04
    we'll look back on this moment in history
  • 01:10:06
    and realise that there was a time
  • 01:10:09
    when we could have used
  • 01:10:11
    our industry's considerable influence
  • 01:10:13
    to change the very ethical underpinnings
  • 01:10:16
    of this sector, acting, perhaps,
  • 01:10:18
    as a companionable craftsman
  • 01:10:21
    in shaping human's decision-making machinery,
  • 01:10:25
    or perhaps more importantly,
  • 01:10:27
    acting as a watchdog
  • 01:10:29
    to ensure that however this technology is used,
  • 01:10:32
    it's not done so carelessly or selfishly
  • 01:10:37
    or secretively.
  • 01:10:38
    The games industry can look at this whole sector and go,
  • 01:10:41
    "Hmm, I don't buy it.
  • 01:10:44
    I don't recognise what they do as what we do at all."
  • 01:10:48
    But you know who doesn't feel that way?
  • 01:10:50
    The organisations who gave People Make Games access
  • 01:10:53
    for this story
  • 01:10:55
    and the military higher ups
  • 01:10:56
    who knew who I was by sight.
  • 01:10:59
    I'm telling you, they've got it all figured out.
  • 01:11:04
    It's time the rest of us caught up.
  • 01:11:06
    Thank you very, very, very much for watching, everybody.
  • 01:11:10
    And an extra special fourth thanks
  • 01:11:12
    to the people who support us
  • 01:11:14
    on patreon.com/peoplemakegames
  • 01:11:16
    for funding journalism like this.
  • 01:11:18
    This video took an extra long time.
  • 01:11:20
    So from me to you, if you supported our work, cheers.
  • 01:11:25
    (lively music)
  • 01:11:55
    (lively music continues)
  • 01:12:26
    (lively music fades)
Tags
  • Wargaming
  • Government
  • Games Industry
  • Ethics
  • Military Simulation
  • Game Design
  • Crisis Management
  • History
  • Technology
  • Innovation